Skip to main content

Advertisement

Identification of immunodominant IgE binding epitopes of Der p 24, a major allergen of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus

Article metrics

Abstract

Background

The identification of house dust mite (HDM) allergens and epitopes is important for allergy diagnosis and treatment. We sought to identify the Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus group 24 allergen (Der p 24) and to identify its immunodominant IgE epitope(s).

Methods

Der p 24 cDNA was cloned and expressed in a pET expression system. The IgE binding activity of purified recombinant (r)Der p 24 was evaluated by western blotting. Truncated Der p 24 proteins and overlapping synthetic polypeptides were subjected to IgE binding assays. Balb/c mice were immunized to investigate IgE epitope induction of IgE production. IgE binding of the 32 N-terminal residues of Der p 24 was compared to other Der p epitopes in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and dot blot assays. Human skin prick tests (SPTs) were performed.

Results

We cloned and expressed Der p 24 cDNA (GenBank accession no. KP893174.1). HDM allergic sera bound rDer p 24 in vitro and 5/10 HDM allergic patients (50%) had positive SPT reactions to rDer p 24. The immunodominant IgE epitope of Der p 24 was localized to the N-terminal 32-residue region, which produced a high specific IgE antibody titer in vivo and promoted mast cell β-hexosaminidase release. The IgE binding activity this N-terminal epitope of Der p 24 was stronger than that of Der p 1 or Der p 2 IgE epitopes.

Conclusions

We identified Der p 24 as a major HDM allergen with strong IgE binding activity via an immunodominant IgE epitope in the N-terminal 32-residue region, which triggers IgE production in vivo. The identified Der p 24 epitope may support HDM allergy diagnosis and treatment.

Introduction

Allergic diseases constitute the most widespread type of immune disorder in the world [1]. The house dust mite (HDM) species Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Der p) and Dermatophagoides farinae (Der f) are major sources of indoor inhaled allergens underlying immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated anaphylactic reactions [2], which can manifest as allergic asthma, allergic rhinitis, and allergic dermatitis [3]. HDM allergens, which trigger reactions in half of allergy sufferers [4], are important components of allergic disease diagnosis and treatment [5]. The rate of HDM allergy is high in developed countries [6]. The previous clinical studies showed that HDM allergic sensitization is above 20% in Europe [7] and up to 40% in North America [8]. Thus, HDM triggered allergy should be a common event.

The identification of novel allergens benefits allergic disease diagnosis and treatment. Of the 38 HDM allergen groups identified, allergens from 32 groups and 23 groups have been identified for Der f and Der p, respectively, and catalogued in the World Health Organization and International Union of Immunological Societies (WHO/IUIS) allergen database (http://www.allergen.org). The most clinically important HDM allergens identified thus far have been group 1, group 2, and group 23 allergens [9], with recent evidence suggesting that HDM group 24 allergens may also be clinically important [10]. Previously, we found that a group 24 Der f allergen, namely Der f 24, was a ubiquinol cytochrome C reductase binding (UQCRB) protein homolog [10]. UQCRB proteins function to maintain complex III in the electron transport chain across phylogenetically diverse species, including insects and mammals [11]. We found that Der f 24 protein yields strong IgE reactivity with sera from HDM allergic patients both in vitro and in vivo [10]. Despite the substantial genetic and therefore protein similarities between Der p and Der f mites, the two species have been shown to have divergent allergen components [12]. Thus, it remains to be determined whether there is a Der p UQCRB protein homolog, which would constitute a novel HDM allergen.

Allergenicity depends upon IgE binding activity. IgE epitopes, also known as B cell epitopes, are the sites where serum IgEs bind allergens to induce inflammatory reactions [13, 14]. Allergen IgE epitope analysis results can provide a good indicator of patients’ allergy sensitivities and help to predict clinical severity and tolerance development potential [15]. Thus far, B cell epitopes have been identified for only group 1, 2, 3, 7, 11, 13, 23 and 33 HDM allergens [16,17,18,19,20,21]. Traditionally, allergen IgE epitopes have been assumed to be involved in the native functions of allergen proteins [22]. However, it is also possible that allergenic IgE epitopes may be a simple consequence of the local amino acid (aa) sequence or produced in relation to its protein function.

Demonstration of the IgE epitope of a Der p 24 allergen would be helpful for advancing HDM allergy diagnosis and treatment. The aims of this study were firstly to examine whether a putative novel Der p 24 allergen can be identified, and secondly, if so, to determine its immunodominant IgE epitope. To achieve these aims, we performed IgE binding activity experiments, employing western blot, dot blot, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in vitro methods as well as in vivo mouse immunization and human skin prick tests (SPTs), and then compared IgE binding activity across Der p groups’ IgE epitopes.

Materials and methods

Serum samples

Serum samples from 50 HDM allergic patients (23 males and 27 females; age range, 18–55 years) and 20 non-allergic control group individuals (8 males and 12 females; age range, 18–55 years) were provided by the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical College. The HDM allergic group consisted of patients who had experienced HDM-triggered anaphylaxis or IgE levels higher than 3 when measured by the ImmunoCAP allergen detection system (Pharmacia Diagnostics, Uppsala, Sweden). A subsample of 10 allergic patients were recruited separately for Der p extract and recombinant (r)Der p 24 skin prick testing (demographic and clinical characteristics summarized in Table 1). Ethics approval was obtained from the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical College. Permission to conduct this study was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical College (No. 2012-51). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. All procedures involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the committee.

Table 1 Skin reactivity

Cell culture

Rat basophilic leukemia cell lines (RBL-2H3 cells) were purchased from the Chinese Academy of Sciences Cell Bank. The cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% l-glutamine–penicillin–streptomycin in 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C. Cells were split every 2–3 days with 0.25% (wt/v) trypsin/1 mM EDTA (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Cloning, expression, and purification of rDer p 24 and its truncated form proteins

The Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) was used to find a UQCRB protein homolog in Der p based on aa sequence. The Der p UQCRB protein was expressed as inclusion bodies, solubilized with guanidine hydrochloride, purified with Ni-NTA resin, and analyzed by 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Specific truncated forms of Der p 24 were used to screen for IgE epitopes. Der p 24 open reading frame cDNA was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The sequences of the primers used in PCRs and expression subcloning are shown in Table 2. Relative cDNA sequences encoding Der p 24 or its truncated-form proteins were synthesized by Genescript Corporation (Nanjing, China). The truncated forms of Der p 24 employed, called Der p 24 (1–98aa), Der p 24 (1–78aa), Der p 24 (1–58aa), Der p 24 (33–118aa), and Der p 24 (21–118aa), are shown in Fig. 2a.

Table 2 Forward (F) and reverse (R) primers used in PCRs and expression subcloning

PCR products were confirmed by DNA sequencing, cloned into pET-His vectors, and transformed into Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) plysS for recombinant protein expression. The expression and purification of recombinant proteins was performed as described previously [23]. Following Ni-NTA gel affinity chromatography purification, the expressed proteins were used in IgE binding activity experiments. Protein concentration was measured by the Bradford method using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a standard. Purified Der p24 protein was analyzed by SDS-to detection of peptide coverage using mass spectrometry (MS) (Beijing Baitai Parker, Beijing, China).

Artificial synthesis of overlapping polypeptides

Overlapping polypeptides of Der p 24 were designed based on the N-terminal 32 residues region of Der p 24, as shown in Fig. 3a. These polypeptides were conjugated with BSA protein, producing BSA-Der p 24(1–32aa), BSA-Der p 24(1–20aa), BSA-Der p 24(10–23aa), BSA-Der p 24(13–26aa), BSA-Der p 24(16–29aa), and BSA-Der p 24(19–32aa), respectively. The main linear IgE epitopes identified previously for Der p 1 (81EYIQHNGVVQESYY94 and 101QSCRRPNAQRF111) and for Der p 2 (65VPGIDPNACHYMK78) were used as positive IgE binding controls. All of these polypeptides were synthesized by Shanghai Qiang Yao Biotech (Shanghai, China) and coupled with BSA at the N-terminus or C-terminus with a purity > 95%; the sequences were confirmed by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight MS analysis.

IgE western and dot blotting

Purified proteins were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE and then transferred to polyvinylidene-fluoride membranes (Millipore, USA) for western blotting. For dot blotting, 2-µg aliquots of polypeptides were applied serially onto nitrocellulose membrane (Millipore, USA); BSA was used as a control. The membranes were blocked with 5% Difco™ skim milk (DSM, BD Biosciences, USA) diluted in Tris buffered saline containing 0.05% Tween 20 (TBST) at 4 °C overnight. Serum samples were incubated for 2.5 h at 37 °C, and then incubated with horse radish peroxidase-conjugated mouse anti-human IgE antibody (1:2000 in TBST with 1% DSM) for 1 h at 37 °C. Antigen–antibody complexes on membranes were visualized with a Pierce™ 3′-diaminobenzidine substrate kit.

IgE-ELISA

Microtiter plates were coated with 100 μl of 2 μg/ml polypeptides (diluted in carbonate buffer, pH 9.6) at 4 °C overnight. The plates were blocked with 5% (w/v) DSM in phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.05% Tween 20 for 3 h at 37 °C. After washing, the plates were incubated with serum from HDM-allergic patients (1:10) for 2.5 h at 37 °C, followed by mouse anti-human IgE-horse radish peroxidase conjugated (1:2000) for 1 h at 37 °C. The signal was detected by adding 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine substrate and the reaction was stopped with 2 M H2SO4. Absorbance was measured at 450 nm by a microplate reader (Bio-Rad, USA). IgE-ELISA results with a positive/negative value > 2.1 were considered positive (P/N, ratio of optical density values of positive and negative result samples). All tests were performed in triplicate.

Skin prick tests

The Skin prick test (SPT) was performed as previously described [24]. Specifically, ethics approval was obtained from the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical College (No. 2012-51). All participants agreed to participate in this study voluntarily and gave written informed consent. Both the patients and healthy controls confirmed that they had not been injected with any drugs or took any medicine during 12 h before the SPT. SPT was performed with recombinant Der p24 protein (10 μg/ml in PBS) and standardized D. pteronyssinus extracts (ALK Abello, Denmark) in 10 dust mite-allergic patients with allergic rhinitis and/or asthma and 12 healthy controls (Table 1). The result was defined as positive when the prick spot became a raised, itchy wheal surrounded by a reddened flare; otherwise, the result was considered negative in the absence of these signs. Negative results were obtained from 12 healthy control subjects.

Structure modeling of Der p 24

Online SWISS-MODEL software was used to model the three-dimensional structure of Der p 24 based on its aa sequence. The 32 N-terminal residues were labelled with a red mark.

Sensitized mice

Balb/c female mice (6–8 weeks old), purchased from Guangzhou Experimental Animal Center (Guangdong, China), were maintained under specific pathogen free conditions. Mice were sensitized by intraperitoneal injection of 50 μg of OVA or OVA-Der p24(1–32aa) antigen with 2 mg of Adjuvant (Imject™ Alum Adjuvant, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA) on experimental days 0, 7, and 14. They received three OVA or OVA-1–32aa antigen boosters by subcutanoeous injection on experimental days 25, 26, and 27. On day 28, serum levels of IgE and IgG specific to BSA-Der p24(1–32aa) were measured by ELISA as described previously [25]. Sera from these mice were later subjected to IgE-western blot analysis and a mast cell degranulation assay wherein ß-hexosaminidase release by RBL-2H3 cells was assessed (described below). Non-sensitized control mice were administered phosphate buffered saline (PBS) according to the above treatment schedule.

RBL-2H3 degranulation assay

Degranulation assays were performed as previously reported with slight modifications [26]. Briefly, RBL-2H3 cells were cultured as described in the above cell culture section. Cells were seeded in 96-well plates for 18 h. After being washed three times with Tyrode’s buffer (25 mM PIPES, 125 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 5.6 mM glucose, 1 mM CaCl2, and 0.1% BSA, pH 7.4), cells were exposed to sera of sensitized mice for 2 h and then stimulated with 10 μg/ml BSA-1–32aa conjugate for 45 min. Degranulation was assessed by measurement of ß-hexosaminidase release into the supernatant and of unreleased enzyme in the respective cell lysate. The percentage release of total ß-hexosaminidase content was calculated from these values and reported.

Histologic analysis

Lung tissues were removed under aseptic conditions for hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. The tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 72 h, embedded in paraffin. The paraffinized samples were sliced into 5-μm sections, stained with H&E, and examined under 100 × magnification. Peribronchial and perivascular inflammation were assessed.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as means with standard deviations (SDs). Statistical analyses were conducted in GraphPad Prism7 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, Calif). Differences between groups were determined by analysis of one-way variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s t test for multiple comparisons. P values < 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Identification of Der p 24 as a novel HDM allergen

BLAST analysis revealed a UQCRB protein homolog in Der p (Fig. 1A). The codon optimized cDNA sequence of this Der p UQCRB protein was cloned into pET expression vector and the resultant purified product was identified by DNA sequencing and found to have a theoretical molecular mass of 14 kDa (Fig. 1B; GenBank no. KP893174.1). MS analysis indicated that a 97.5% coverage rate was achieved. Representative results from two coverage peptides are shown in Fig. 1C. These data confirm that a rDer p UQCRB protein homolog was obtained.

Fig. 1
figure1

Cloning, recombinant expression, and allergenic identification of Der p 24. A Sequence analysis of Der p 24 protein. BLAST homology comparison of Der p 24 and Der f 24 (GenBank No. AJK91617.1). After codon optimization, synthesized Der p 24 cDNA was subcloned into pET expression system to generate Der p 24 (theoretical molecular mass = 14 kDa; GenBank accession no. KP893174.1). B SDS-PAGE analysis of purified rDer p 24 stained with Coomassie brilliant blue. C Peptide coverage of rDer p 24 based on MS analysis: 10–28aa peptide data shown in a and 79–90aa peptide data shown in b. D IgE binding activity determined by IgE-western blots of rDer p 24 with individual sera from 8 HDM-allergic patients (a) and 8 healthy non-allergic individuals (b)

IgE western blot analysis showed that the rDer p UQCRB protein reacted with serum IgEs from individual HDM allergic patients (Fig. 1D). In SPTs with the Der p UQCRB protein, 5/10 allergic patients (50%) had positive reactions (Table 1). Based on the present data, the WHO/IUIS allergen nomenclature subcommittee published this allergenic protein as Der p 24 (http://www.allergen.org/viewallergen.php?aid=855).

Localization of IgE epitope of Der p 24 to N-terminal region

Truncated forms of Der p 24 used to screen IgE binding epitopes were expressed in a pET expression system, purified with Ni-NTA resins, and analyzed by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 2a, b). Western blot analysis showed strong IgE reactivity of three of the truncated proteins, namely Der p 24 (1–98aa), Der p 24 (1–78aa), and Der p 24 (1–58aa), with serum from HDM allergic patients. The two truncated proteins that were unreactive, Der p 24 (33–118aa) or Der p 24 (21–118aa), lacked the N-terminal region of Der p 24 (Fig. 2c).

Fig. 2
figure2

Localization of an IgE epitope of Der p 24 to the N-terminus. a Schematic representation of truncated Der p 24 fragments used for IgE epitope mapping. b SDS-PAGE analysis of rDer p 24 and five truncated forms of rDer p 24 after Ni-NTA resin purification. The gel was stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue. c IgE binding activity of truncated Der p 24 fragments determined by IgE-western blots with pooled sera from 8 HDM-allergic patients

Immunodominant IgE epitope in 32 N-terminal residues of Der p 24

The IgE binding activity of synthetic overlapped polypeptides coupled with BSA, namely BSA-Der p 24(1–32aa), BSA-Der p 24(1–20aa), BSA-Der p 24(10–23aa), BSA-Der p 24(13–26aa), BSA-Der p 24(16–29aa), and BSA-Der p 24(19–32aa) (Fig. 3a), was evaluated with IgE-ELISAs (Fig. 3b), IgE-dot blots (Fig. 3c), and IgE-western blots (Fig. 3d). The BSA-Der p 24(1–32aa) conjugate produced a stronger positive reaction with serum IgEs from individual HDM-allergic patients than did the other conjugates (Fig. 3b, c). BSA-Der p 24(16–29aa) and BSA-Der p 24(19–32aa) were bound weakly by IgEs in HDM allergic sera (Fig. 3c). The N-terminal region of Der p 24 exhibited multi-immunodominant epitopes. IgE-western blotting showed that BSA-Der p 24(1–32aa) was bound by serum IgEs from eight HDM allergic patients but not bound by serum IgEs from three non-allergic individuals (Fig. 3d).

Fig. 3
figure3

Identification of N-terminal 32 residues of Der p 24 is an immunodominant IgE epitope. a Synthesized overlapping polypeptides designed according to the N-terminal 32 residue sequences and conjugated with BSA protein for comparative analysis of IgE binding reactivity. b IgE-ELISAs of overlapping polypeptides with individual sera from 15 HDM-allergic patients. P values < 0.05 were considered significant. c IgE-dot blot of overlapping polypeptides (2 μg each) incubated with sera from 5 HDM-allergic patients (P1–P5; subset from experiment in B with positive reactions) and pooled sera from 3 non-allergic controls (N). d IgE-western blot of BSA-Der p 24(1–32aa) polypeptide conjugate with serum samples from 8 HDM-sensitized patients (P1–P8) and 3 non-allergic individuals (N1–N3). e Homology-based three-dimensional model of the structure of Der p 24, which included two alpha helices and two random coils. The N-terminal-32 residue region is labelled red

Homologous three-dimensional structural modeling of Der p 24 in SWISS-MODEL software indicated that the 32-residue N-terminal region has three ɑ-helices and a free loop structure positioned on the outside of whole folded protein (Fig. 3e). This external location may facilitate IgE binding. These results indicate that the N-terminal 32 residues of Der p 24 form an immunodominant complex with multi-type B cell epitopes, including conformational and linear epitopes, of which a conformational epitope is dominant.

N-terminal region of Der p 24 induces IgE production in vivo

Balb/c mice were immunized with an OVA-Der p 24(1–32aa)-conjugate, OVA, or PBS (negative control) in accordance with the experimental design shown in Fig. 4a. Subsequently, the OVA-Der p 24(1–32aa) group produced high specific IgG and IgE titers against the BSA-Der p 24(1–32aa) conjugate (Fig. 4b, c). Serum from mice immunized with OVA-Der p 24(1–32aa), but not OVA- or PBS-injected mice, showed specific IgE binding to Der p 24(1–32aa) (Fig. 4d) and promoted significant release of β-hexosaminidase from mast cell line RBL-2H3 mast cells with the addition of BSA-Der p 24 (1–32aa) conjugate. The mean ß-hexosaminidase release observed with the OVA-Der p 24(1–32aa) group was 19.14%, consistent with mast cell degranulation, whereas the percentages obtained for the OVA and PBS groups were just 5.95% and 5.38%, respectively (Fig. 4e). In addition, H&E histology showed that lungs from mice in the OVA-Der p 24(1–32aa) group exhibited enhanced signs of inflammation compared to the PBS group (Fig. 4f). These results demonstrate that the immunodominant IgE epitopes of Der p 24 identified in this study can induce specific IgE production in vivo.

Fig. 4
figure4

Induction of IgE production by N-terminal 32-residue region of Der p 24 in Balb/c mice. a Experimental design. Postmmunization indirect ELISA detection of specific IgG (b) and IgE (c) antibodies against the conjugate. d IgE-western blot of rDer p 24 with sera from the OVA-Der p 24(1–32aa) (m1–m3 represent three different individuals) and OVA (c1 and c2 represent two different individuals) groups. e Significantly greater RBL-2H3 cell ß-hexosaminidase release was induced by sera from the OVA-Der p24(1–32aa) group than that induced by sera from the OVA and PBS groups. f Light photomicrographs of H&E-stained sections of lung tissues in mice challenged with OVA-Der p24(1–32aa), OVA, or PBS (× 100 magnification). P values < 0.05 were considered significant

High IgE binding of N-terminal epitope of Der p 24

IgE-ELISAs with separate serum samples from 30 individual HDM allergic patients showed strong IgE binding activity of the 32-residue N-terminal region of Der p 24, exceeding that seen for the main linear IgE epitopes of Der p 1 or Der p 2 (Fig. 5a). IgE-dot blot results obtained for BSA-Der p 24(1–32aa) from Der p 24 and similarly constructed Der p 1 and Der p 2 peptide region conjugates with sera from eight HDM allergic patients and two non-allergic control individuals (randomly selected from allergic and control groups) are shown in Fig. 5b. IgE-ELISAs of serum samples from patients with asthma, rhinitis, urticarial, and dermatitis allergy manifestations (N = 10 per manifestation) revealed no correlation between the IgE binding activity of Peptide-1–32aa from Der p 24 and allergic disease symptoms (Fig. 5c).

Fig. 5
figure5

IgE binding activity of N-terminal epitope of Der p 24 and main linear IgE epitopes of Der p 1 or Der p 2. a Indirect IgE-ELISA with serum samples from HDM-sensitized patients (N = 30) and non-allergic controls (N = 2). b IgE-dot blot analysis with sera from HDM allergic patients (N = 8, P1–P8) and non-allergic individuals (N = 2, N1–N2). c Indirect IgE-ELISA for detecting specific IgE against immunodominant IgE epitopes of Der p 24 with individual serum samples from HDM allergic patients with symptom manifestations of only asthma, rhinitis, urticaria, or dermatitis (N = 10 per manifestation group). Mean values are shown with standard errors and p values < 0.05 were considered significant

Discussion

Based on the presently reported in vitro and in vivo IgE binding activity data, the UQCRB protein homolog identified in Der p was named Der p 24 and catalogued as such in the WHO/IUIS allergen database. The N-terminal 32-residue region of Der p 24 was bound by specific IgEs from HDM allergic sera in vitro and produced specific IgE antibodies in vivo, indicating that this region is an immunodominant IgE epitope of Der p 24 allergen.

Although the allergenic components of the globally important HDM species Der f and Der p [27] are highly homologous, differences in the sequences of their allergenic components can lead to differing IgE binding and reactivity sensitization mechanisms [12]. Hence, detailed knowledge about each major HDM allergen can inform the rational design of hypoallergenic vaccines and immunotherapy agents [28], particularly relative to agents produced from crude HDM extracts composed of a mixture of allergenic proteins and unrelated impurities that can produce highly variant effects, desensitization, and adverse secondary effects [29].

The epitopes of most HDM allergens have yet to be clearly resolved. The identification and analysis of immunodominant IgE epitopes of allergens, especially the major allergens, can help to elucidate allergen-induced sensitization mechanisms and provide information that can be used improving immunotherapy outcomes [30]. Prior to this study, the B cell epitopes of group 1, 2, 3, 7, 11, 13, 23 and 33 HDM allergens had been identified and IgE responses to HDMs had been shown to target serodominant epitopes, primarily, Der p 1, 2, and 23 components, with intermediate responses to Der p 4, 5, 7, and 21 components (titers proportional to serodominant specificities in 30–50% of subjects) [31].

Genetic recombinant hybrid proteins have become a favored immunotherapy approach [32]. Der p 1 and Der p 2 fragments in particular have emerged in candidate hypoallergenic molecules for HDM tolerance-development and vaccination approaches [7]. In this context, the identification of the immunodominant epitope of Der p 24 may facilitate the development of a broad-spectrum hypoallergenic vaccine for HDM allergy. The N-terminal 32-residue region of Der p 24 conjugated with OVA induced specific IgE production in vivo, indicating that it contains multi-type B cell epitopes, including a specific number of conformational and linear epitopes, capable of stimulating the innate immune pathways that trigger IgE production and allergy symptoms. Additionally, the BSA-Der p 24(1–32aa)-conjugate could enhance the proliferation of percentages of CD4 + T cells (Data not shown). It requires more experimental evidence to confirm which amino acid sites are critical for the T cell epitope of Der p 24. Further research is needed to elucidate the details of how immune pathways are activated by Der p 24 in vivo. Notwithstanding, the present data indicate that the novel allergen Der p 24, a UQCRB protein homolog, represents a good candidate for HDM allergy diagnosis and therapy applications owing to its specific allergenic sequences.

The ongoing discovery of HDM allergens may ultimately lead to a complete HDM allergen panel that can enable component-resolved diagnosis and patient-tailored therapies [33]. Component-resolved diagnostics makes use of defined allergen molecules to analyze IgE-mediated sensitization on a molecular level [34]. Der f 2 was shown to be the most frequently sensitized allergen among HDM-sensitized respiratory allergy and atopic dermatitis patients in a Korean study, wherein the combination of group 1 and 2 major allergens improved diagnostic sensitivity [35]. In a serological proteome analysis study, a group 11 HDM allergen was found to contain an HDM allergic serum IgE-recognized allergen component [36]. Interestingly, sensitization to Der p 10 was shown to result from seafood-cockroach cross-reactivity in a study with participants from coastal southern China [37]. Because we found that the IgE binding activity of the N-terminal 32-residue region of Der p 24 was stronger than that of linear IgE epitopes of Der p 1 or Der p 2, we investigated whether a peptide constituted by that region, namely Peptide-1–32aa, may be a component-resolved diagnostic biomarker for HDM allergy and may associate with particular allergic symptoms. Our negative IgE-ELISA results regarding associations with symptom manifestation may be due to the small sample size (N = 10 per symptom group). An analysis of a larger sample size may reveal symptom associations. Further studies are needed to analyze the relationship between group 24 HDM allergen sensitization and allergic disease expression.

Sensitization mechanisms have been elucidated for very few of the 38 recognized groups HDM allergens. Hence, questions remain regarding the allergenic mechanisms of HDM proteins, with potential mechanisms including native protein function effects and immunogenicity of unique sequences that form IgE B cell epitopes. The clinically important group 1 and 2 HDM allergens—which exhibit IgE-binding activity with sera from most patients with mite allergies [38]—were shown to induce Th2 immune responses through their protein functions. That is, Der p 1’s allergenicity is consequent to its native cysteine protease function [39] while Der p 2 facilitates Toll-like receptor 4 signaling [40]. On the contrary, we found that the immunodominant N-terminal 32-residue epitope of Der p 24 induced specific IgE production in vivo and bound serum IgEs from sensitized mice to promote mast cell degranulation without any apparent relation to the native Der p 24 UQCRB protein function. Hence, the particular mechanism of allergenicity appears to vary among HDM allergens.

Conclusions

The presently reported experiments led to the identification of Der p 24 as a major HDM allergen with robust IgE binding activity. The immunodominant IgE epitope of Der p 24 was localized to the N-terminal 32-residue region, which produced high titers of specific IgE antibodies in vivo. The present demonstration that the Der p 24 N-terminal epitope exhibited stronger IgE binding activity than linear IgE epitopes of Der p 1 or Der p 2 suggests that it may be useful as a component resolved diagnostic maker for HDM allergic diseases. These findings have theoretical implications for the development of diagnostic and therapeutic reagents for HDM allergy.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Fassio F, Guagnini F. House dust mite-related respiratory allergies and probiotics: a narrative review. Clin Mol Allergy. 2018;16:15.

  2. 2.

    Thomas WR. House dust allergy and immunotherapy. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2012;8(10):1469–78.

  3. 3.

    Terreehorst I, Oosting AJ, Tempels-Pavlica Z, de Monchy JG, Bruijnzeel-Koomen CA, Hak E, van Wijk RG. Prevalence and severity of allergic rhinitis in house dust mite-allergic patients with bronchial asthma or atopic dermatitis. Clin Exp Allergy. 2002;32(8):1160–5.

  4. 4.

    Chen KW, Blatt K, Thomas WR, Swoboda I, Valent P, Valenta R, Vrtala S. Hypoallergenic Der p 1/Der p 2 combination vaccines for immunotherapy of house dust mite allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;130(2):435–44.

  5. 5.

    Calderon MA, Kleine-Tebbe J, Linneberg A, De Blay F, Fernandez Hernandez, de Rojas D, Virchow JC, Demoly P. House dust mite respiratory allergy: an overview of current therapeutic strategies. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2015;3(6):843–55.

  6. 6.

    Calderon MA, Linneberg A, Kleine-Tebbe J, De Blay F, Fernandez Hernandez, de Rojas D, Virchow JC, Demoly P. Respiratory allergy caused by house dust mites: what do we really know? J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;136(1):38–48.

  7. 7.

    Bousquet PJ, Chinn S, Janson C, Kogevinas M, Burney P, Jarvis D. Geographical variation in the prevalence of positive skin tests to environmental aeroallergens in the European Community Respiratory Health Survey I. Allergy. 2007;62(3):301–9.

  8. 8.

    Chew GL, Reardon AM, Correa JC, Young M, Acosta L, Mellins R, Chew FT, Perzanowski MS. Mite sensitization among Latina women in New York, where dust-mite allergen levels are typically low. Indoor Air. 2009;9(3):193–7.

  9. 9.

    Lahiani S, Dumez ME, Bitam I, Galleni M. Der p 5 allergen from house dust mite: first epitope mapping of rabbit IgG blocking antibodies. New Microbes New Infect. 2019;27:69–74.

  10. 10.

    Chan TF, Ji KM, Yim AK, Liu XY, Zhou JW, Li RQ, Yang KY, Li J, Li M, Law PT, Wu YL, Cai ZL, Qin H, Bao Y, Leung RK, Ng PK, Zou J, Zhong XJ, Ran PX, Zhong NS, Liu ZG, Tsui SK. The draft genome, transcriptome, and microbiome of Dermatophagoides farinae reveal a broad spectrum of dust mite allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;135(2):539–48.

  11. 11.

    Jung HJ, Cho M, Kim Y, Han G, Kwon HJ. Development of a novel class of mitochondrial ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase binding protein (UQCRB) modulators as promising antiangiogenic leads. J Med Chem. 2014;57(19):7990–8.

  12. 12.

    Aki T, Kodama T, Fujikawa A, Miura K, Shigeta S, Wada T, Jyo T, Murooka Y, Oka S, Ono K. Immunochemical characterization of recombinant and native tropomyosins as a new allergen from the house dust mite, Dermatophagoides farinae. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1995;96(1):74–83.

  13. 13.

    Galli SJ, Tsai M. IgE and mast cells in allergic disease. Nat Med. 2012;18(5):693–704.

  14. 14.

    Narayanan M, Freidl R, Focke-Tejkl M, Baranyi U, Wekerle T, Valenta R, Linhart B. AB cell epitope peptide derived from the major grass pollen allergen Phl p 1 boosts allergen-specific secondary antibody responses without allergen-specific T cell help. J Immunol. 2017;198(4):1685–95.

  15. 15.

    Takai T, Izuhara K. Allergens in modern society: updated catalogs and future prospects. Allergol Int. 2015;64(4):293–304.

  16. 16.

    Takai T, Kato T, Yasueda H, Okumura K, Ogawa H. Analysis of the structure and allergenicity of recombinant pro- and mature Der p 1 and Der f 1: major conformational IgE epitopes blocked by prodomains. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005;115(3):555–63.

  17. 17.

    Chruszcz M, Chapman MD, Vailes LD, Stura EA, Saint-Remy JM, Minor W, Pomes A. Crystal structures of mite allergens Der f 1 and Der p 1 reveal differences in surface-exposed residues that may influence antibody binding. J Mol Biol. 2009;386(2):520–30.

  18. 18.

    Bronnert M, Mancini J, Birnbaum J, Agabriel C, Liabeuf V, Porri F, Cleach I, Fabre A, Deneux I, Grandne V, Grob JJ, Berbis P, Charpin D, Bongrand P, Vitte J. Component-resolved diagnosis with commercially available D. pteronyssinus Der p 1, Der p 2 and Der p 10: relevant markers for house dust mite allergy. Clin Exp Allergy. 2012;42(9):1406–15.

  19. 19.

    Chou H, Tam MF, Lee SS, Tang RB, Lin TH, Tai HY, Chen YS, Shen HD. Asp159 is a critical core amino acid of an IgE-binding and cross-reactive epitope of a dust mite allergen Der f 7. Mol Immunol. 2011;48(15–16):2130–40.

  20. 20.

    de Halleux S, Stura E, VanderElst L, Carlier V, Jacquemin M, Saint-Remy JM. Three-dimensional structure and IgE-binding properties of mature fully active Der p 1, a clinically relevant major allergen. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;117(3):571–6.

  21. 21.

    Fanuel S, Tabesh S, Sadroddiny E, Kardar GA. Analysis of predicted B and T-cell epitopes in Der p 23, allergen from Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus. Bioinformation. 2017;13(9):307–12.

  22. 22.

    Milian E, Diaz AM. Allergy to house dust mites and asthma. P R Health Sci J. 2004;23(1):47–57.

  23. 23.

    Liu XY, Kun-Mei JI, Gao B, Liu ZG. Expression, purification and identification of the recombinant allergen Der p2 from Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and investigation on its immunological activities. Chin J Zoonoses. 2009;009(9):929–35.

  24. 24.

    Wainstein BK, Studdert J, Ziegler M, Ziegler JB. Prediction of anaphylaxis during peanut food challenge: usefulness of the peanut skin prick test (SPT) and specific IgE level. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2010;21(4 Pt 1):603–11.

  25. 25.

    Sybilski AJ, Doboszynska A, Samolinski B. Total and antigen-specific IGE levels in umbilical cord blood. Eur J Med Res. 2009;14(Suppl 4):233–6.

  26. 26.

    Taylor JA, Karas JL, Ram MK, Green OM, Seidel-Dugan C. Activation of the high-affinity immunoglobulin E receptor Fc epsilon RI in RBL-2H3 cells is inhibited by Syk SH2 domains. Mol Cell Biol. 1995;15(8):4149–57.

  27. 27.

    Elkady A. Allergy to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Der p1) and Dermatophagoides farina (Der f1) in patients with atopic asthma. Int J Sci Res. 2015;4(11):1896–902.

  28. 28.

    Thomas WR, Smith W, Hales BJ, Carter MD, Bennett BJ, Shen HD, Tovey ER, Chua KY. Recombinant house dust mite allergens. Arb Paul Ehrlich Inst Bundesamt Sera Impfstoffe Frankf A M. 1997;91:87–94 (discussion 94–96).

  29. 29.

    Winther L, Arnved J, Malling HJ, Nolte H, Mosbech H. Side-effects of allergen-specific immunotherapy: a prospective multi-centre study. Clin Exp Allergy. 2006;36(3):254–60.

  30. 30.

    Akdis M, Akdis CA. Mechanisms of allergen-specific immunotherapy: multiple suppressor factors at work in immune tolerance to allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;133(3):621–31.

  31. 31.

    Thomas WR. IgE and T-cell responses to house dust mite allergen components. Mol Immunol. 2018;100:120–5.

  32. 32.

    Gonzalez-Rioja R, Ibarrola I, Arilla MC, Ferrer A, Mir A, Andreu C, Martinez A, Asturias JA. Genetically engineered hybrid proteins from Parietaria judaica pollen for allergen-specific immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;120(3):602–9.

  33. 33.

    Cui Y, Wang Q, Jia H. Consideration of methods for identifying mite allergens. Clin Transl Allergy. 2018;8:14.

  34. 34.

    Jakob T, Muller U, Helbling A, Spillner E. Component resolved diagnostics for hymenoptera venom allergy. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;17(5):363–72.

  35. 35.

    Jeong KY, Lee JY, Son M, Yi MH, Yong TS, Shin JU, Lee KH, Kim YJ, Park KH, Park HJ, Lee JH, Park JW. Profiles of IgE sensitization to Der f 1, Der f 2, Der f 6, Der f 8, Der f 10, and Der f 20 in Korean house dust mite allergy patients. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2015;7(5):483–8.

  36. 36.

    Conti A, Burastero GJ, Suli C, Banerjee S, Vrtala S, Alessio M, Burastero SE. Identification by serological proteome analysis of paramyosin as prominent allergen in dust mite allergy. J Proteomics. 2017;166:19–26.

  37. 37.

    Zeng G, Luo W, Zheng P, Wei N, Huang H, Sun B, Zhao X. Component-resolved diagnostic study of Dermatophagoides Pteronyssinus major allergen molecules in a Southern Chinese Cohort. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2015;25(5):343–51.

  38. 38.

    Best EA, Stedman KE, Bozic CM, Hunter SW, Vailes L, Chapman MD, McCall CA, McDermott MJ. A recombinant group 1 house dust mite allergen, rDer f 1, with biological activities similar to those of the native allergen. Protein Expr Purif. 2000;20(3):462–71.

  39. 39.

    Chevigne A, Jacquet A. Emerging roles of the protease allergen Der p 1 in house dust mite-induced airway inflammation. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;142(2):398–400.

  40. 40.

    Matsumura Y. Role of allergen source-derived proteases in sensitization via airway epithelial cells. J Allergy (Cairo). 2012;2012:903659.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the other members of Ji kunmei lab for their critical comments and Department of Allergy & Clinical Immunology of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical College in R.P. China for supporting serum sample collection.

Funding

The present study was supported in part by research funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81571570 and No. 30671943), Guangdong Province (Grant Nos. 2014A030313563, 2016A020215176, 2016A030313039, 2017A010105014 and 2018A050506083), Shenzhen City 2016 Biochemistry Discipline Construction and CIFMS-2016-I2M-1-003.

Author information

Conceived and designed the study: JKM and SJL. Analyzed the data: CZL and CJJ. Performed the studies: CZL, ZZ, CJJ, HYB and HYS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: CJJ and JKM. Wrote the manuscript: CZL, CJJ and JKM. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Correspondence to Jin-Lyu Sun or Kunmei Ji.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Permission to conduct this study was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical College (No. 2012-51). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. All procedures involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the committee.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Keywords

  • House dust mite
  • Der p 24
  • Immunodominant IgE epitope
  • IgE-binding