Interchangeability and comparative effectiveness between generic and brand montelukast immediate release tablets after a single oral administration in healthy volunteers
© Zaid et al. 2015
Received: 23 July 2015
Accepted: 16 October 2015
Published: 11 November 2015
Montelukast is a leukotriene receptor antagonist. The release of leukotrienes causes narrowing and constricting in the respiratory airways. Blocking the action of these leukotrienes, montelukast can be used for the prophylaxis and treatment of chronic asthma.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the interchangeability and comparative effectiveness between a generic and a brand montelukast 10 mg immediate release tablets (Broncast® and Singulair®, respectively) after a single oral dose among Arab Mediterranean volunteers.
An open-label, randomized two-period crossover bioequivalence design was conducted in 31 healthy male volunteers with a 1 week washout between each study period and under fasting conditions. The plasma drug concentration was assessed by using a previously validated LC MS/MS method. The ratio between the generic and brand of geometric least squares means was reported for both generic and brand products. Moreover, an in vitro dissolution study was conducted on generic and brand tablets using three different pH media, and similarity and non-similarity factors (f2 and f1) were calculated.
The used bioanalytical method was found to be linear within the range 6.098–365.855 ng/mL. The correlation coefficient was close to 0.999 during the course of the study validation. Statistical comparison of the main pharmacokinetic parameters showed the inexistence of any significant difference between generic and the brand. The point estimates (ratios of geometric means) were 111.939, 111.711, and 112.169 % for AUC0–24, AUC0–∞, and Cmax, respectively. The 90 % confidence intervals (CIs) were within the pre-defined limits of 80.00–125.00 % as specified by the FDA and EMA for bioequivalence studies. F2 and f1 were higher than 50 and lower than 15, respectively in all selected pH media.
Broncast® immediate release film coated tablets (10 mg/tablet) are bioequivalent to Singulair® immediate release film coated tablets (10 mg/tablet), with a comparable safety and efficacy profile. This suggests that these two formulations can be clinically considered interchangeable. The dissolution study suggests that it could be used as premarketing quality control parameter in order to maintain the high quality of the produced product.
KeywordsMontelukast Bioequivalence Immediate release Safety Efficacy
Montelukast (MT) is a photolabile powder with the following IUPAC name: (R,E)-2-(1-((1-(3-(2-(7-chloroquinolin-2-yl)vinyl)phenyl)-3-(2-(2-hydroxypropan-2-yl)phenyl)propylthio)methyl)cyclopropyl) acetic acid [1, 2]. MT is a potent; orally administered and active drug with anti-inflammatory properties that significantly improves asthmatic inflammation factors. It has a great affinity and selectivity to CysLT1 receptors over other respiratory tract receptors; such as the prostanoid; cholinergic; or β-adrenergic receptors. MT specifically inhibits the physiological action of LTC4; LTD4; LTE4 leukotrienes at CysLT1 receptors without any agonist activity [3–6]. Therefore; it is indicated for the prophylaxis and chronic treatment of asthma in adults and over 1 year-old pediatric patients; and it helps to control the symptoms of seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis [4, 7, 8]. It has also demonstrated to be effective in the prevention of asthma caused by exercise in patients aged above 6 years . Bioavailability studies showed that the presence of food in the GIT does not affect bioavailability parameters when an immediate release tablet is given with a standard meal [4, 10].
The oral bioavailability of MT when administered as a 10 mg immediate release (IR) film-coated tablet in adults was found to be 58–66 % . In 2012, MT (Singulair®) immediate release tablets and other dosage forms including granules and chewable tablets were approved by the FDA for the treatment of asthma and allergic rhinitis. It is usually administered once daily in a dose of 10 or 5 mg per tablet or granules . In the current study, the generic MT immediate release tablets were formulated in a single strength (10 mg/tablet). This product was developed to be as effective, and safe as the original brand. Accordingly, the objective of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of MT tablet formulations (10 mg/tablet) by comparing its pharmacokinetic parameters with the original brand. In addition, the in vivo safety of the two formulations (generic and brand) based on clinical and laboratory examinations and documentation of any adverse effect was also investigated.
The study was a comparative, randomized, two-period, two-treatment, two-sequence, single dose, open label, crossover bioequivalence study of a generic MT 10 mg immediate release coated tablets (one tablet) (Avalon Pharma, Middle East pharmaceutical industries Co Itd, KSA) Versus Singulair® 10 mg Film-Coated Tablets (one tablet) (Merck Sharp and Dohme Limited, Shotton Lane, Cramlington, Northumberland, NE23 3JU, UK) in healthy Subjects under fasting conditions given to healthy subjects under fasting conditions.
Volunteers and clinical protocol
The study was conducted by Arab Pharmaceutical Industry Consulting Co. Ltd./Jordan in accordance with the requirements of the declarations of Helsinki , the current Good Clinical Practice (GPC) Guidelines  and the International Conference Harmonization (ICH) Guidelines . The study protocol and the informed consent forms were approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB). The volunteers were aged between 18 and 50 years, weighing between 57 and 93 kg with an average weight of 76 kg with body-mass index 18.5–30.0 kg/m2 inclusive, non-smokers or light smokers (smokers of not more than 10 cigarettes per day).The volunteers were subjected to a full medical and physical exam to confirm their healthy status and were not on any medication during the study period. The nature of the study was explained to the volunteers throughout a written informed consent, which was given to each one. The volunteers were instructed to abstain from taking drugs 1 month before starting the study, caffeine and alcohol-containing beverages for at least 16 h prior to each phase of the study and throughout the study period and to fast for at least 10 h before MT administration.
The study used an open-label, randomized two-period crossover design with a 9-day washout period between doses in 32 healthy subjects under fasting conditions. Thirty-two healthy adult male volunteers were recruited to participate in the study. 31 subjects completed the study and 31 subjects were evaluated for pharmacokinetic data. One volunteer was excluded by the clinical investigator due to an insufficient platelet count. The volunteers were randomly divided into two groups of 16 and 15 subjects. The first group was given the reference brand and the second group was given the test formulation with a crossover after the washout period. On the morning of the study, each volunteer gave a blood sample to serve as a blank for the drug assay. Each volunteer received an oral dose of the assigned MT formulation administered with 240 mL of water in the sitting position. During each period blood samples were collected from each volunteer for the calculation of the PK parameters at zero and up to 24 h after drug dosing. Each sample volume was 8 mL, 1 h before dosing, and 8 mL samples were withdrawn at following time points 0.50, 1.00, 1.50, 1.75, 2.00, 2.25, 2.50, 2.75, 3.00, 3.25, 3.50, 3.75, 4.00, 5.00, 6.00, 8.00, 12.00, 16.00 and 24.00 h after dosing. Blood samples were collected in tubes containing heparin, and centrifuged to separate the plasma fraction of the blood. The resulting plasma was immediately stored at −70 °C and analyzed by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). Four hours after drug administration a standard lunch meal containing soup (no carrots), half a chicken, rice with mixed vegetables (no carrots), yogurt, a loaf of bread, salad (tomato and cucumber) was served and subjects had free access to water 1 h after drug administration.
Chemicals and reagents
MT working standard (99.4 %) was supplied by Morepen Laboratories Ltd. (State Hemachal Pradesh, India) while the MT-d6 internal standard (97 %) was supplied by TRC (North York, Canada). HPLC-grade methanol and acetonitrile were purchased from Romil (Cambridge, UK), iso-propanol was obtained from Carbon Group (Cork, Ireland), extra pure formic acid was obtained from Scharlau (Port Adelaide, Australia), diethylether was obtained from JHD (Guangzhou, China) and HPLC grade water was supplied by Sartorius Purified Water (Goettingen, Germany). Control human plasma was harvested from donors.
Tested brand and formulated tablets
The generic tablets, Broncast® immediate release coated tablets (10 mg mg/tablet) were obtained from Avalon Pharma, (Middle East Pharmaceutical Industries Co Ltd, KSA) batch number 303111. Singulair® immediate release coated tablets (10 mg/tablet) were obtained from Merck Sharp and Dohme (Northumberland, UK) and had a batch number of 322559.
Instruments and chromatographic separations
A simple, fast, selective, accurate and precise High Performance Liquid Chromatographic method (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, United States) interfaced with an API 4000 tandem MS system (AB Sciex, Framingham, USA) was used in the analysis for the determination of MT in human plasma. The method was validated for its application to the analysis of MT in authentic plasma samples harvested after a single dose of MT 10 mg IR film coated tablets. To complete the present bioequivalence study, sampling lasted for 24.00 h after dosing; consequently a limit of quantification was 6.098 ng/mL. Montelukast-d6 was employed as the internal standard for MT, to perform its function of compensating for assay variability in the total analytical process. The stationary phase was ACE 5 CN (B2). The column used was an ACE 5 CN, 5 cm length and 4.6 mm internal diameter (HiChrom, Reading, UK). The mobile phase was composed of acetonitrile; 0.005 M ammonium acetate and formic acid in a ratio of 80:20:0.1 (v/v/v), respectively. The pH of the mobile phase was 4.30 ± 0.2. The injection volume was 10 µL and the flow rate was 0.80 mL/min. 100 % methanol was used as flushing Solution. The retention times for the drug and internal standard were 0.95 min. Dissolution test apparatus (Labindia, India) was used to assess the dissolution behavior and release of MT from tablets.
Preparation of standard and working solutions
A drug solution was prepared by dissolving 0.08 g MT in methanol and the solution was taken up to 50.00 mL final volume to make a stock solution containing 1524.4 μg/mL. The stock solution was diluted in a serial dilution using same methanol to produce a final standard solution of 10.00 mL containing 76.22 μg/mL MT. The stock solution for the internal solution was prepared by dissolving 0.00108 g of Montelukast-d6 and the volume was made up to 100 mL with methanol to make up a stock solution 10.101 μg/mL. The internal standard stock solution was diluted in a serial dilution using methanol to produce a final standard solution of 10.00 mL containing 0.505 μg/mL. The working solutions for calibration, QC sample and IS were prepared. Prior to the extraction, each sample including: calibrators, QC samples and authentic samples were spiked with the IS solution (MT-d6). All the calibrators and the QC samples were spiked with IS in which 0.1 mL of plasma was spiked by 30 µl of the stock internal solution to get final concentration of IS of 119.5 ng/mL. Then 1 mL of ACN was added in order to eliminate proteins. Then the supernatant was analyzed.
Bioanalytical validation procedure
The method was validated for its application to the analysis of MT in the biological fluids. Sampling lasted 24 h after drug administration in order to finalize the BE study.
The linearity assessment was performed using a series of nine standard plasma solutions previously spiked with MT (calibrator), were employed for constructing calibration curves covering a concentration ranging from 6.098 to 609.759 ng/mL. The accuracy and precision were determined by using a minimum of six replicates per concentration level. LOQ was determined by injecting a series of diluted solutions with known concentrations. In addition, stock solution stability in mobile phase was evaluated using two standard mixtures (along with internal standard). These mixtures were equivalent to the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) and upper limit of quantification (ULOQ).
Short and long-term matrix based stabilities were evaluated using two MT concentrations, quality control low (QCL) and quality control high (QCH). Stability after freeze and thaw cycles was assessed using two QC samples. The QC samples were prepared to have low (QCL), medium (QCM) and high (QCH) concentrations (MT: 18.293, 304.879, and 457.319 ng/mL). Four QC samples were incorporated with each analysis run as unknown samples. The drug concentration in each QC sample was calculated from the calibration curve and was compared with the nominal concentration. The analysis run was accepted if at least 67 % of QC samples were within ±15 % of the nominal values.
In vitro release of MT from film coated tablets
HPLC analytical parameters for MT
Buffer solution: dissolve 1.36 g potassium dihydrogen phosphate in 1 l and adjust PH to 4.0 with 20 % v/v phosphoric acid
Mix 1400 mL acetonitrile with 600 mL of buffer solution and filter through 0.45 µm membrane filter
Inertsil ODS-2 (25 cm × 4.6 mm) 5 μm
Column oven temperature
Sample cooler temperature
Standard solution preparation
Standard solution contains: 0.02 mg/mL of montelukast
Sample solution preparation
Standard solution contains: 0.02 mg/mL of montelukast
Nylon filter is suitable after discarding the first 3 mL
PTFE filter is suitable after discarding the first 3 mL
The in vitro release of MT from the generic and brand immediate release film-coated tablets was conducted using USP Apparatus (II paddles) . The tablets (12) were placed in the paddles of the dissolution apparatus (1 tablet/paddle) which contains 900 mL of dissolution media and the paddles were rotated at a speed of 50 rpm. The temperature was kept at 37 °C during the entire period of the dissolution study. Samples (5 mL) were taken at 5, 10, 15, and 30 min. Fresh dissolution medium (5 mL) was added to the paddles after each sample was taken. A standard was prepared of 0.011 mg/mL using same dissolution media. The samples (study and standard) were filtered through a 0.45 μm Millipore filter. A sample of 0.25 μL was injected into the HPLC apparatus. According to ICH guidelines and for the purpose of in vitro premarketing studies, this test was repeated in three different dissolution media, 01 N HCl, 4.5 acetate buffer and 6.8 phosphate buffer, respectively.
Pharmacokinetic and statistical analysis
MT plasma concentration for each of the subjects in each time point was reported and according to this data; MT plasma concentration vs. time curves were designed for both tablet products. The elimination rate constant (Kel) was calculated from the slope of the semi-logarithmic plot of the terminal elimination phase of the blood concentration–time curve. The equation t1/2 = ln2/Kel was used to calculate the elimination half–life time (T1/2). The areas under the MT blood concentrations time curves from (AUC0–24) and the area to the infinity (AUC0–∞) were calculated by using the classical linear trapezoidal equation. Extrapolation to the infinity was calculated by dividing the last measurable MT blood concentration C24 by terminal rate constant kel. The AUC0–∞ was calculated according to the equation: AUC0–∞ = AUC0–24 + AUC24–∞. The statistical method used to determine the BE between both formulations was based on the procedure known as two one-sided test; to determine if transformed average values of PK parameters measured after administering both the test and reference MT tablets are comparable.
For the statistical analysis of data derived from this in BE study, one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess the effect of formulations, periods, sequences and subjects on AUC0–24, AUC0–∞, and Cmax. A commercially available software package (Thermo Scientific Kinetica, version 5.1) was used for the calculations.
Results of validation procedures
Results of dissolution study and similarity factor
Summary of f 2 and f 1 for MT in dissolution media
0.1 N HCl
pH 4.5 phosphate buffer
pH 6.8 phosphate buffer
Results of pharmacokinetic study
Summary of calculated PK parameters
Efficacy results summary
As geometric means (ranged for) Cmax and AUCRatio
AUC0→Last (ng h/mL)
AUC0→inf (ng h/mL)
As medians (ranges) for Tmax, and t1/2
Point estimate (ratio of geometric mean %)
Lower limit %
Upper limit %
Bioequivalence results summary
The FDA defines a brand drug as a drug marketed under a proprietary, trademark-protected name while a generic drug is similar as the brand name drug with regard to active ingredient, dosage form, strength, route of administration, quality, safety and efficacy as assessed from the PK profile, intended use, and contains the same chemical form. However, generic versions of a drug can vary in quality of excipients and visual appearance including shape, scoring, and packaging. If all the previous criteria are met, then the two drugs are considered to be therapeutically equivalent and therefore can be safely interchangeable . During the development stage of any generic oral solid dosage form, several trials and tests are carried out in order to achieve a generic product that can be as safe and effective as well as the original brand. Dissolution study of the drug in three different kinds of pH media was recommended by international guidelines in order to predict if the generic and brand could show comparable in vivo activity. In fact, these tests could be a very useful indicator as premarketing marker for each batch of oral solid drug formulation and they can be used as a biowaiver for in vivo BE studies which were assessed for the initial produced batch. In this contest, the results of dissolution showed that the generic product was comparable with the original brand. In fact, f2 and f1 were within the recommended criteria of biowaiver studies for MT at pH 1.2, 4.5 and 6.8 (Table 2).
Summary of PK parameters of MT (10 mg/immediate release table) from different countries
AUC0–24 mean ± SD ng h/mL
AUC0–∞ mean ± SD ng h/mL
3251.6 ± 1221.8
3284.9 ± 1270.0
460.5 ± 170.9
3.4 ± 1.6
3162.5 ± 1537.6
3196.5 ± 1546.8
440.6 ± 227.4
3.4 ± 1.4
2443 ± 729
2530 ± 763
396 ± 120
4.9 ± 1.0
2659 ± 905
2750 ± 960
444 ± 153
4.9 ± 1.0
334.07 ± 1247.39
3.837.01 ± 1294.98
526.27 ± 178.24
3.9 ± 0.5
3733.46 ± 1248.14
3833.83 ± 1289.03
540.60 ± 190.88
4.0 ± 0.7
3707.37 ± 1 417.53
3818.73 ± 1520.90
580.40 ± 215.99
4.54 ± 0.63
3433.37 ± 1359.8
3546.19 ± 1447.11
543.13 ± 222.17
4.72 ± 0.77
The main objective of this study was to assess the bioavailability of MT 10 mg immediate release tablets produced by Avalon Pharma, versus the reference MT 10 mg (Singulair® immediate release coated) produced by Sharp Merck Dohme. The two dosage forms were orally administered to 31 fasting male volunteers in order to eliminate the interference of food on drug absorption. The validated LC–MS method described above was utilized for quantification of MT 10 mg. Analytical method was successfully applied for PK studies. In fact, all validation parameters were carried out according to the ICH guidelines and they were within the accepted criteria as reported in Table 2. Regarding the efficacy of the generic product, statistical comparison of the main PK parameters, AUC0–24, AUC0–∞, Cmax and Tmax clearly showed the inexistence of a significant difference between test and reference tablets, in any of the assessed PK parameters. The achieved values were in accordance with the FDA and EMEA requirements for bioequivalence of generic drugs since the AUC0–24, AUC0–∞, and Cmax mean ratios are within the 80–125 % interval [18, 19].
Several clinical studies have highlighted the efficacy of Singulair® immediate release coated tablets in the treatment of asthma in both adults and children, and for the symptomatic relief of allergic rhinitis [28–32]. Recently, Fey and et al. evaluated the efficacy and safety of montelukast 4 mg oral granules (Sandoz generic relative to Singulair® mini). The extrapolated PK values were close to our results; however, the author did not specify the race of subjects that have been used in his study . Accordingly, we invite authors of similar studies to specify the race of the population underlying bioavailability and BE studies in order to see if a dose adjustment could be taken into consideration for better efficacy and safety. Given the BE demonstrated for Broncast® 10 mg immediate release coated tablets, this product is expected to be equally efficacious and well-tolerated. Safety is very important factor in selecting a suitable therapy, in this study the administered drugs were tolerated and all the participated volunteers completed the whole study without showing any sign of adverse effect and released in good health. Accordingly, this product offers a cheap, safe and effective treatment option for subjects with asthma or seasonal/perennial allergic rhinitis.
The statistical analysis of the results which carried out on AUC0–24, AUC0–∞ and Cmax using the ANOVA method dimonstrated that the test tablets (10 mg MT immediate release coated tablets) produced by Avalon Pharma and the reference brand tablets (Singulair® 10 mg immediate release coated tablet) are bioequivalent, since they release equivalent quantities of active ingredient to the systemic circulation at equivalent rates for both AUC0–24 and Cmax ratios within the 80–125 % interval proposed by FDA and the EMA agency. These results showed that the new generic tablets are clinically effective and can be safely interchanged with the original brand. Moreover, the release of MT from tablets in the selected pH media could be used as a useful premarketing quality control parameter in order to guarantee same efficacy and safety of each produced batch of this product.
All authors substantial contributed towards the formulation development, in vivo and in vitro analysis and interpretation of the data, and critically revised the manuscript for intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- DrugBank: Montelukast sodium. Merck & Co. Inc. Whitehouse Station, NJ, 08889, USA. 2012. http://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/montelukast#section=Top.
- LookChem®: Montelukast sodium. 2015. http://www.lookchem.com/Product_30698/CasNo_151767-02-1/Montelukastsodium.html.
- Merck: Singulair Montelukast sodium. Patient information Singulair®. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. 2012. https://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_circulars/s/singulair/singulair_ppi.pdf.
- Merck: Singulair Montelukast sodium. The prescribing information for Singulair®. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. 2012. https://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_circulars/s/singulair/singulair_pi.pdf.
- SINGULAIR. Comprimidos. MSD: http://www.medicamentosplm.com/productos/singulair_comprimidos_ masticables.htm.
- Keith PK, Koch C, Djandji M, Bouchard J, Psaradellis E, Sampalis JS, Schellenberg RR, McIvor RA. Montelukast as add-on therapy with inhaled corticosteroids alone or inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta-2-agonists in the management of patients diagnosed with asthma and concurrent allergic rhinitis (the RADAR trial). Can Respir J. 2009;16(Suppl A):17A–31A.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Blake KV. Montelukast: data from clinical trials in the management of asthma. Ann Pharmacother. 1999;33(12):1299–314.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bozek A, Warkocka-Szoltysek B, Filipowska-Gronska A, Jarzab J. Montelukast as an add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of severe asthma in elderly patients. J Asthma. 2012;49(5):530–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ducharme FM, Noya FJ, Allen-Ramey FC, Maiese EM, Gingras J, Blais L. Clinical effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroids versus montelukast in children with asthma: prescription patterns and patient adherence as key factors. Curr Med Res Opin. 2012;28(1):111–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ghorwade V, Patil A, Patil S, Srikonda K, Kotagiri R, Patel P. Development and evaluation of fast-dissolving film of montelukast sodium. WJMPBS. 2011;1(1):06–12.Google Scholar
- US Food and Drug Administration. FDA approves first generic versions of singulair to treat asthma, allergies. 2012. http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm314436.htm.
- World Medical Association. “Declaration of Helsinike” as amended by the 59th world medical assembly. Seoul: World Medical Association, Inc; 2008.Google Scholar
- EMA, European Medicines Agency. Note for guidance on good clinical practice. London, UK: European Medicines Agency; 1997 (CPMP/ICH/135/95).Google Scholar
- ICH, International Conference on Harmonization. Harmonization tripartite guideline. Guidelines for good clinical practice. In: International conference of harmonization of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human uses; 1996; Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
- US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry: statistical approaches to establishing bioequivalence. 2001 http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/dissolution/dsp_SearchResults_Dissolutions.cfm?PrintAll=1.
- Emami J. In vitro–in vivo correlation: from theory to applications. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2006;9(2):169–89.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fortunato D. Dissolution method development for immediate release solid oral dosage forms. Dissolution Technol. 2005;12(3):12–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- European Medicines Agency. Note for guidance on the investigation of bioavailability and bioequivalence (CPMP/EWP/QWP/1401/98). London, UK; 2001.Google Scholar
- Food and Drug Administration. Glossary of terms. http://www.fda.gov/drugs/informationondrugs/ucm079436.htm.
- Kanjanawart S, Gaysonsiri D, Tangsucharit P, Vannaprasaht S, Phunikhom K, Kaewkamson T, Wattanachai N, Tassaneeyakul W. Comparative bioavailability of two montelukast tablet formulations after single-dose administration in healthy Thai male volunteers. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011;49:525–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zheng R, Kim BH. Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of montelukast granules and montelukast tablets in Korean healthy volunteers. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014;52:530–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Damle B, Duczynski G, Jeffers BW, Crownover P, Coupe A, LaBadie RR. Pharmacokinetics of a novel orodispersible tablet of montelukast in healthy subjects. Clin Ther. 2014;36:236–344.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Scaparrotta A, Di Pillo S, Attanasi M, Rapino D, Cingolani A, Consilvio NP, Verini M, Chiarelli F. Montelukast versus inhaled corticosteroids in the management of pediatric mild persistent asthma. Multidiscip Respir Med. 2012;7(1):13.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Muñoz E, Ocampo DO, Espinal EE, Yépes N. Bioequivalence study of two 10 mg montelukast immediate-release tablets formulations: a randomized, single-dose, open-label, two periods. Crossover Study. J Bioequiv Avail. 2014;6(3):086–90.Google Scholar
- Sripalakit P, Maphanta S, Saraphanchotiwitthaya A. Bioequivalence study of two generic formulations of 10 mg montelukast tablets in healthy Thai male volunteers. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010;48(9):628–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Public assessment report of the medicines: db.cbg-meb.nl/Pars/h111822.pdf. http://db.cbg-meb.nl/Pars/h111822.pdf. Accessed 18 Sept 2015.
- Hayashi H. Personalized drug therapy-directed clinical pharmacology research based on genetic polymorphisms and pharmacokinetics analysis. Yakugaku Zasshi. 2013;133(10):1079–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pedroso P, Almeida S, Filipe A, Neves RI, Boudreault S, Jiménez C. Bioequivalence studies for two different strengths of montelukast in healthy volunteers: 10 mg film-coated tablets and 5 mg chewable tablets. Drug Res (Stuttg). 2013;63(9):477–83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Blake KV. Montelukast: data from clinical trials in the management of asthma. Ann Pharmacother. 1999;33(12):1299–314.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cingi C, Gunhan K, Gage-White L, Unlu H. Efficacy of leukotriene antagonists as concomitant therapy in allergic rhinitis. Laryngoscope. 2010;120(9):1718–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Modgill V, Badyal DK, Verghese A. Efficacy and safety of montelukast add-on therapy in allergic rhinitis. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 2010;32(9):669–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yamamoto H, Yamada T, Sakashita M, Kubo S, Susuki D, Tokunaga T, Ogi K, Terasawa Y, Yamashita S, Kayano Y, Masada M, Kimura Y, Fujieda S. Efficacy of prophylactic treatment with montelukast and montelukast plus add-on loratadine for seasonal allergic rhinitis. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2012;33(2):e17–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fey C, Thyroff-Friesinger U, Jones S. Bioequivalence of two formulations of montelukast sodium 4 mg oral granules in healthy adults. Clin Transl Allergy. 2014;4:29.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar