Skip to main content

Anomalous asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Google Trends patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic



An increase in online searches on health topics may either mirror epidemiological changes or reflect media coverage. In the context of COVID-19, this is particularly relevant, as COVID-19 symptoms may be mistaken for those of respiratory disease exacerbations. Therefore, we aimed to assess Internet search patterns on asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in the context of COVID-19, as compared to searches on other chronic diseases.


We retrieved Google Trends (GTs) data on two respiratory (asthma and COPD) and three non-respiratory (diabetes, hypertension, and Crohn’s disease) chronic diseases over the past 5 years (up to May 31, 2020). For 54 countries, and for each disease, we built autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models to predict GTs for 2020 based on 2015–2019 search patterns. In addition, we estimated the proportion of searches in which COVID-19-related terms were used. To assess the potential impact of media coverage on online searches, we assessed whether weekly “asthma” GTs correlated with the number of Google News items on asthma.


Over the past 5 years, worldwide search volumes for asthma and COPD reached their maximum values in March 2020. Such was not observed for diabetes, hypertension and Crohn’s disease. In 38 (70%) countries, GTs on asthma were higher in March 2020 than the respective maximum predicted values. This compares to 19 countries for COPD, 23 for hypertension, 11 for Crohn’s disease, and 9 for diabetes. Queries with COVID-19-related terms represented up to 47.8% of the monthly searches on asthma, and up to 21.3% of COPD searches. In most of the assessed countries, moderate-strong correlations were observed between “asthma” GTs and the number of news items on asthma.


During March 2020, there was a peak in searches on asthma and COPD, which was probably mostly driven by media coverage, as suggested by their simultaneity in several countries with different epidemiological situations.


Google Trends (GTs), a web-based surveillance tool, can provide insights into the real-life epidemiology of diseases and outbreaks. This tool provides information—on a relative scale—on how often a certain keyword or query is searched, allowing to compare different regions, time periods, or keywords. However, as GTs assess individuals’ health information-seeking behaviour, data do not often reflect the true epidemiological situation of the searched conditions [1, 2]. In fact, there are cases that describe media coverage being associated with anomalously high online interest on many health topics, such as coronary heart disease [3], pollen counts [4, 5] or COVID-19 [6, 7].

In the context of COVID-19, several GT-based studies have been conducted with the aim of assessing whether online search data correlated with the number of COVID-19 cases and deaths. Variable results have been observed [8, 9]. In addition, GTs have been used to assess variations in online searches for health topics, with particular focus on mental health and behaviour-related searches [10,11,12,13,14]. In fact, different studies consistently found a decrease in searches for suicide- and depression/anxiety-related terms in the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic [11, 12, 14]. Search patterns on respiratory diseases, however, have been less often assessed. While a preliminary study visually identified anomalous online search interest for asthma occurring simultaneously in several countries of the Northern and Southern Hemispheres (Bousquet et al., unpublished data), it is unclear as to what has been driving such unparalleled search interest, and whether similar search patterns also occur with other respiratory and non-respiratory chronic diseases. Understanding whether the perception of symptoms of chronic respiratory diseases may be masquerading those of COVID-19 [15], or whether searches are being driven mostly by users’ curiosity/concerns, may have potentially relevant implications. Such implications concern, among others: (i) the usefulness of GTs in the epidemiological monitoring of chronic diseases, (ii) the way the occurrence of COVID-19 in patients with chronic respiratory diseases is being discussed in the media, or is being communicated to patients, and (iii) the pertinence of Google providing health screening questionnaires following searches on certain expressions [16].

Therefore, in this infodemiological study, we aimed to quantify whether there was an increased search activity on two chronic respiratory diseases—asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)—in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, we aimed to assess whether such eventual abnormal search activity (i) could also be observed in other chronic diseases, and (ii) was associated with COVID-19-related searches.


We assessed online searches for two respiratory diseases (asthma and COPD) and three non-respiratory chronic diseases over the past 5 years up until May 31, 2020. This period includes the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Online searches were assessed using GTs (; Google, LLC, Mountain View, CA, USA) for 54 countries identified by GTs as “major countries”, including 23 in Europe, 19 in Asia and the Pacific, ten in the Americas, and two in Africa. We adopted a time series approach and assessed in detail how the COVID-19 pandemic impacted search patterns on these diseases.

Disease and keyword selection

We focused on asthma and COPD and included three non-respiratory chronic diseases (diabetes, hypertension, and Crohn’s disease) for comparison. The three non-respiratory chronic diseases were selected on the grounds that (i) diabetes and hypertension are common comorbid conditions that have been associated with a worse COVID-19 prognosis and (ii) Crohn’s disease—like asthma—is relatively frequent in young people (who are the most active Internet users), and can manifest as diarrhoea (which may also occur in COVID-19). We did not assess any other chronic disease, as GTs limit the number of simultaneously compared queries to five. In particular, we did not assess rhinitis as it does not appear to be associated with COVID-19 searches (Bousquet, submitted).

In addition, GTs for chronic respiratory diseases were plotted along GTs for acute pneumonia. Searches for acute pneumonia were used as a proxy for searches for coronavirus/COVID-19 (as the search volume for the latter is so large that comparisons with chronic diseases are impossible), since searches on these two concepts reached their maximum values at the same time throughout 2020 (Bousquet, unpublished).

On account of the selected diseases, we retrieved GTs data on the following keywords (as “topics”): “asthma”, “chronic obstructive pulmonary disease”, “diabetes”, “hypertension”, and “Crohn’s disease”. For pneumonia, the keyword “acute pneumonia” (as “topic”) was used (of note, in GTs, “topics” are groups of search terms that share the same concept [17]; “asthma”, “chronic pulmonary obstructive disease”, “Crohn’s disease” and “acute pneumonia” are classified by Google as being “disease topics”; “diabetes” as a “disorder topic”; and “hypertension” as a “medical condition topic”). Along with GTs on these keywords, we retrieved GTs data on searches involving each chronic disease and COVID-19-related terms (this allowed us to quantify how much the 2020 GTs peaks on chronic diseases were driven by COVID-19-related searches). For each country, we built a query in its native language(s), consisting of terms specific to each chronic disease along with COVID-19-related terms (Additional file 1: Table S1). Whenever available, we used top-related or rising query expressions (starting on the most popular and until the character limit was reached). In the absence of relevant top-related or rising queries, we combined the most popular terms to search for each chronic disease along with the most popular terms to search for COVID-19/coronavirus.

Data analysis

Google Trends values represent the Google search interest over time for a given topic as a proportion of all searches on all topics on Google at that time and location. Values are indexed to 100, where 100 is the maximum search interest for the time and location selected. The values are re-indexed according to the selected time period.

We started by analysing the worldwide search interest patterns of these five chronic diseases over the past 5 years (up to May 31, 2020), to visually assess the presence of spikes during the COVID-19 pandemic. For this assessment, GTs on chronic diseases were plotted along GTs for “acute pneumonia”. As a particular case, we compared the volume of searches subsequent to the thunderstorm-asthma of Australia (November 2016) with COVID-19-associated searches in asthma, as the former was the largest “asthma” spike that had previously been retrieved worldwide [18].

Subsequently, we studied the search patterns of the five aforementioned chronic diseases during 2020 (January–May) in the 54 countries identified by GTs as “major countries”. Our aim was to assess whether the search interest values on chronic diseases in each of these countries exceeded those that would be expected based on patterns from the previous years. For this assessment, we built seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models to predict GTs for 2020 based on the GT patterns from 2015–2019. Seasonal ARIMA models are defined by the parameters (p, d, q)(P, D, Q)s, with p corresponding to the order of autoregression, d to the degree of difference, q to the order of the moving average part, P to the seasonal order of autoregression, D to the seasonal integration, Q to the seasonal moving average, and s to the length of the seasonal period [19] (for an example of the use of seasonal ARIMA models for health forecasting, as well as for a discussion on their methodological strengths and limitations, please consult the study of Song et al. [19]). In this study, we applied seasonal ARIMA(3,0,2)(0,1,1)52 models, using weekly GT data (thus explaining the length of the seasonal period—s—being 52). For each model, we retrieved the maximum values—for the whole year of 2020, and for the month of March—of the upper bound of 95% confidence intervals of predicted GTs (“maximum predicted values”). Such maximum values were compared with the maximum observed GTs for the year of 2020 (January–May) and for the month of March. A search peak was formally defined as any situation in which, for a given search term, the observed GT exceeded the respective maximum predicted value.

Subsequently, for the year of 2020, we considered that GTs on each of the five selected chronic diseases (i.e., total volume of searches in a given period of time) could be divided into two components: (i) searches without any COVID-19-related term, and (ii) online searches on each chronic disease along with COVID-19-related terms (i.e., “COVID-19 related-searches” estimated for each country, using the queries listed in Additional file 1: Table S1). For each month, we calculated the average proportion that the latter represented among GTs on each chronic disease. In addition, for each month, we subtracted the average GTs on each chronic disease + COVID-19-related terms from the average total GTs on each chronic disease. The difference was compared with the respective predicted value as estimated by previously described seasonal ARIMA models. This allowed us to assess whether there might be an excess of searches on asthma beyond that explained by queries including COVID-19-related terms.

Finally, to preliminarily assess the impact of media coverage on online searches, we estimated the correlations between GTs and Google News (; Google, LLC, Mountain View, CA, USA) items on asthma in 19 different countries. For each country, we retrieved the weekly number of Google News search results (i.e., searches in news items, which differ from the Google News aggregator service present in several countries) when searching the query “asthma” in the respective language and applying the respective country and language restriction filters. Unrelated results (namely those which had only been retrieved because the respective websites advertised news for asthma) were not counted. Correlations were estimated by computing Pearson correlation coefficients.

Data analysis was performed using software R version 4.0.0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).


Five-year searches for chronic diseases

When visually analysing 5-year data from all countries combined, we observed that asthma and (on a lesser scale) COPD searches reached their maximum values in March 2020, simultaneously with a search spike on acute pneumonia (Fig. 1). In Australia, the maximum volume of asthma searches in March 2020 was 23% lower than that observed in the week of November 20–26, 2016 (associated with the thunderstorm-induced asthma). On the other hand, there were only two countries where the 2020 GTs for COPD reached higher values than those for asthma: in Hungary, COPD maximum values occurred 2 weeks after those for asthma, whereas in Turkey, they occurred simultaneously (Additional file 1: Fig. S1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Worldwide 5-year Google Trends for respiratory and non-respiratory chronic diseases

For non-respiratory chronic diseases, no worldwide search spikes were visually identified in 2020 (Fig. 1). By contrast, we identified annual spikes for diabetes associated with the World Diabetes Day. Visually assessing 2020 data for each specific country (Additional file 1: Figs. S1, S2), large diabetes spikes were found for three specific countries, namely Italy (starting during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and having a 2-month duration), Romania (week of March 29) and Sweden (week of April 12). In these three cases, maximum 2020 GTs were greater than GTs in the “World Diabetes Day” weeks.

Quantification of search peaks for chronic diseases in 2020

In March 2020, search peaks for asthma GTs were identified in 38 out of the 54 studied countries (70.4%) (Tables 1, 2). Such peaks were observed in the assessed countries of Europe (apart from Romania, Russia and Ukraine), in the Americas (apart from Mexico), in Australia and New Zealand, but only in one third of Asian countries. Search peaks for COPD were temporally consistent with those of asthma, but were only observed for 19 countries, mostly those located in Central Europe, North America, and the Pacific. However, COPD search peaks were overall smaller than those observed for asthma.

Table 1 Observed and predicted maximum values for Google Trends (GT) on five chronic diseases (January–May 2020)
Table 2 Observed and predicted maximum values for Google Trends (GT) on five chronic diseases (March 2020)

Peaks for non-respiratory chronic diseases were not as geographically and/or temporally consistent as those for asthma or COPD. Throughout 2020, the monthly average of GTs on hypertension exceeded the predicted values in 23 countries (42.6%), mostly those in Europe (n = 12) and Latin America (n = 6). However, most GT peaks occurred in April or May (n = 14), including those observed in all Latin American countries. Peaks for diabetes mellitus and Crohn’s disease were observed in fewer countries (n = 9 and n = 11, respectively), and were highly variable depending on their region, month, and magnitude (of note, Crohn’s disease peaks were frequently identified in Middle Eastern countries, a fact that might be related to typos in users’ queries, given the similitude of the Arabic and Farsi words for “Crohn” and “corona”).

Disentangling chronic diseases and COVID-19 searches

Out of the 38 countries in which asthma search peaks were identified, 28 (73.7%) had top-related or rising-related queries involving COVID-19-related terms. On the other hand, this occurred in five out of 22 (23%) countries for COPD, 11 out of 23 (48%) for hypertension, five out of nine (56%) for diabetes, and in 0 out of 11 for Crohn’s disease.

In March 2020, asthma COVID-19-related searches were detected in all countries except Egypt, representing between 4.4% (for the Philippines and India) and 47.8% (for Spain) of the GTs on that disease (Table 3; Fig. 2). Overall, the percentage of COVID-19-related searches was higher in European countries, reaching over 40% in six of them. By contrast, apart from New Zealand, the percentage of COVID-19-related searches did not exceed 30% in any of the non-European countries. We also observed a variable excess of searches on asthma beyond those explained by queries including COVID-19-related terms. In March 2020, such an excess represented between 0% (for Italy) and 47.9% (for Greece) of the GTs on “asthma”.

Table 3 Expected and excess Google Trends on asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
Fig. 2
figure 2

Monthly average Google Trends for “asthma” (as a disease) between January and May of 2020

The maximum percentage of COVID-19-related searches was 21.3% for COPD (the Netherlands) (Table 3; Fig. 3). For non-respiratory chronic diseases, 20.2% was reached for diabetes (United Kingdom), 20.5% for hypertension (Switzerland), and 4.7% for Crohn’s disease (Egypt) (Additional file 1: Table S2, Figs. S2–S4). The number of countries for which COVID-19-related search represented  < 1% of all GTs was eight for COPD, compared to four for diabetes, five for hypertension, and nine for Crohn’ disease.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Monthly average Google Trends for “chronic obstructive pulmonary disease” (COPD) (as a disease) (2020, January–May)

In most countries, the number of Google News items on asthma reached their maximum value in March 2020 (Additional file 1: Fig. S5). The subsequent pattern was less consistent across countries, the number of asthma news remaining high in some and decreasing in others (often with new rises). Therefore, while GTs and Google News displayed moderate-strong correlations for the whole of 2020 (often reaching their maximum values in the same week), such correlations were stronger when specifically assessing the months of January to March (Additional file 1: Table S3). While weaker correlations were found for countries in which small or no GT asthma peaks were observed (e.g., Italy and South Korea), this was not always the rule (as suggested for the correlations observed in Colombia and the US).


In this study, we found that, during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, there was a consistent increase in web searches on “asthma” observed in several countries, particularly in March. Such an increase was variably associated with information-seeking on asthma and COVID-19 simultaneously, and resembled the thunderstorm-induced asthma-related searches in Australia (i.e., no other situation over the past years has prompted such an increase of asthma searches in all countries). Smaller and less frequent search peaks were observed for COPD, with the role of queries involving COVID-19-related terms appearing to be smaller. Such increased search activity was not consistently observed for the assessed non-respiratory chronic diseases.

Asthma primarily affects the respiratory system, and some of the main symptoms of COVID-19 are also respiratory. This fact, along with a relative lack of information (particularly when compared to diabetes or hypertension) on whether asthma can be associated with a worse prognosis of COVID-19 [20], may partly explain the particularly evident search increase observed for asthma. Another possible explanation concerns the fact that young adults, and especially parents, are particularly active Internet users [21]. In fact, asthma is relatively common among young adults and even more among children (in relation to whom, parents may wish to seek health information). Such an increase may be smaller for COPD as the latter (i) is more frequent at a more advanced age (with the elderly being less active on the Internet than the younger [1]), and (ii) is less known among the general public. In fact, regarding COPD, some of the most frequent top-related queries consisted of just asking what COPD was (data not shown).

This study suggests that GTs alone may be inadequate for prospectively assessing the epidemiology of chronic diseases, and questions Google’s strategy of displaying screening questionnaires when searching for key expressions [16]. In fact, in this study, we found that asthma search peaks occurred simultaneously in several countries in the Northern and Southern hemispheres, irrespective of the COVID-19 epidemiological situation (as suggested by the relatively small Italian search peak) or of environmental phenomena. This suggests that media coverage plays a major role in influencing GTs, as corroborated not only by the moderate-strong correlations observed with the frequency of Google News items (which should be carefully interpreted, as the amount of news does not necessarily reflect their impact), but also by the observation of search spikes related to health awareness campaigns (e.g., World Diabetes Day), or celebrity-related events. As an example, the death of the Swedish TV presenter Adam Alsing on April 15 2020—who died of COVID-19 and was known to be at risk of developing diabetes [22]—prompted the largest Swedish number of searches on diabetes of the past 5 years (observed on April 15–17). The largest Turkish GTs on COPD (occurring in the second quarter of March) also appear to be related to the death of the Turkish commander Aytaç Yalman (who suffered from COPD) on March 15 [23], as well as to the widely mediatized statements by respiratory clinicians, including members of the Turkish Thoracic Society [24, 25].

This study has important limitations that are worth discussing. Firstly, we limited our comparison to five chronic diseases, as GTs are provided on a relative scale (i.e., on a 0 to 100 scale, with 100 corresponding to the maximum volume of searches registered for the included keywords in the selected location and period of time) and do not allow the comparison of more than five queries simultaneously. However, we tried to select chronic conditions whose symptoms could masquerade those of COVID-19 or which are widely known to be associated with a worse COVID-19 prognosis. Additional limitations concern the queries used for retrieving GTs on searches involving both chronic diseases and COVID-19-related search terms, and which could have resulted in an underestimation of the percentage of searches that were COVID-19-related. In fact, due to the GT limitation of characters, we were not able to build queries using every combination of chronic disease and COVID-19-related terms. For the cases in which we were not able to include all relevant top-related and/or rising queries, we made sure that we selected the most popular ones. On the other hand, for countries in which no relevant top-related or rising queries were available, we had to build expressions ourselves, combining both chronic diseases and COVID-19-related terms. While important search variations might have been missed (particularly in countries whose native language is not fluently spoken by any of the authors of this manuscript), the impact of missing those expressions is not expected to be particularly large, as otherwise they would have been listed as top-related or rising queries. Finally, an important GT limitation concerns the geographical and demographic representativeness of Internet users. In fact, Internet use is still highly asymmetrical across different regions of the globe. Of the 54 countries identified by GTs as “major countries”, only two are located in Africa, which is home to one-seventh of the world population. In addition, in each country, the elderly (among whom diseases such as COPD, hypertension or diabetes are more frequent) are particularly underrepresented among Internet users [1], and literacy may also influence the topics of online searches.

This study also has relevant strengths. We assessed over 50 countries worldwide and took a 5-year period into account. In addition, we applied a time series approach to estimate whether the number of observed searches was higher than that predicted based on the data of previous years. Finally, we quantified the proportion of excess searches that may be related to COVID-19.

In conclusion, this study suggests that, during the COVID-19 pandemic, there was an anomalous increase in online searches on chronic respiratory diseases, which was partly accounted for by searches on COVID-19-related terms. There was also a less evident peak for COPD. Such peaks were not regularly observed for other chronic diseases. This study points to the inadequacy of GTs as an isolated tool to assess the epidemiology of chronic diseases (and, most notably, to assess it prospectively), as search patterns can be highly influenced by users’ concerns and media coverage.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



Autoregressive integrated moving average


Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease


Google Trends


  1. Eysenbach G. Infodemiology and infoveillance: framework for an emerging set of public health informatics methods to analyze search, communication and publication behavior on the Internet. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(1):e11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Barbosa M, Morais-Almeida M, Sousa C, Bousquet J. The, “Big Five” lung diseases in CoViD-19 pandemic—a Google Trends analysis. Pulmonology. 2020.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Pandey A, Abdullah K, Drazner MH. Impact of Vice President Cheney on public interest in left ventricular assist devices and heart transplantation. Am J Cardiol. 2014;113(9):1529–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bousquet J, Agache I, Berger U, Bergmann KC, Besancenot JP, Bousquet PJ, et al. Differences in reporting the ragweed pollen season using Google Trends across 15 countries. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2018;176(3–4):181–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bousquet J, Agache I, Anto JM, Bergmann KC, Bachert C, Annesi-Maesano I, et al. Google Trends terms reporting rhinitis and related topics differ in European countries. Allergy. 2017;72(8):1261–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bento AI, Nguyen T, Wing C, Lozano-Rojas F, Ahn YY, Simon K. Evidence from internet search data shows information-seeking responses to news of local COVID-19 cases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117(21):11220–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Sousa-Pinto B, Anto A, Czarlewski W, Anto JM, Fonseca JA, Bousquet J. Assessment of the impact of media coverage in coronavirus-related Google Trends: infodemiology study. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(8):e19611.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Higgins TS, Wu AW, Sharma D, Illing EA, Rubel K, Ting JY, et al. Correlations of online search engine trends with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) incidence: infodemiology study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020;6(2):e19702.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Szmuda T, Ali S, Hetzger TV, Rosvall P, Sloniewski P. Are online searches for the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) related to media or epidemiology? A cross-sectional Study. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;97:386–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Heerfordt C, Heerfordt IM. Has there been an increased interest in smoking cessation during the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic? A Google Trends study. Public Health. 2020;183:6–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jacobson NC, Lekkas D, Price G, Heinz MV, Song M, O’Malley AJ, et al. Flattening the mental health curve: COVID-19 stay-at-home orders are associated with alterations in mental health search behavior in the United States. JMIR Ment Health. 2020;7(6):e19347.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Misiak B, Szczesniak D, Koczanowicz L, Rymaszewska J. The COVID-19 outbreak and Google searches: is it really the time to worry about global mental health? Brain Behav Immun. 2020;87:126–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Searle T, Al-Niaimi F, Ali FR. Dermatological insights from Google Trends: what does the public think is important during COVID-19 lockdown? Clin Exp Dermatol. 2020;45(7):891–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sinyor M, Spittal MJ, Niederkrotenthaler T. Changes in suicide and resilience-related google searches during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. Can J Psychiatry. 2020;65(10):741–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Riggioni C, Comberiati P, Giovannini M, Agache I, Akdis M, Alves-Correia M, et al. A compendium answering 150 questions on COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2. Allergy. 2020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gillison DH. Learn more about anxiety with a self-assessment on Search. 2020. Accessed 29 June 2020.

  17. Mavragani A, Ochoa G. Google Trends in infodemiology and infoveillance: methodology framework. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2019;5(2):e13439.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Bousquet J, O’Hehir RE, Anto JM, D’Amato G, Mosges R, Hellings PW, et al. Assessment of thunderstorm-induced asthma using Google Trends. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;140(3):891–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Song X, Xiao J, Deng J, Kang Q, Zhang Y, Xu J. Time series analysis of influenza incidence in Chinese provinces from 2004 to 2011. Medicine. 2016;95(26):e3929.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Morais-Almeida M, Pite H, Aguiar R, Ansotegui I, Bousquet J. Asthma and the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: a literature review. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2020;181:680–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yardi S, Caldwell PH, Barnes EH, Scott KM. Determining parents’ patterns of behaviour when searching for online information on their child’s health. J Paediatr Child Health. 2018;54(11):1246–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bäsén A. Smittan slår mot ung och gammal. Expressen. 2020. Accessed 29 June 2020.

  23. Bakan Koca'dan Aytaç Yalman açıklaması. Cumhuriyet. 2020. Accessed 29 June 2020.

  24. Astim ve KOAH hastalari için koronavirüs uyarilari. Medikal Teknik. 2020. Accessed 29 June 2020.

  25. Yener D. KOAH hastalarına koronavirüs uyarısı. Anadolu Ajansı. 2020. Accessed 29 June 2020.

Download references


Not applicable.


This paper was written by five members of DigitalHealthEurope Grant Agreement Number: 826353 Support to a Digital Health and Care Innovation initiative in the context of Digital Single Market strategy, SC1-HCC-05-2018. Publication of this article was supported by National Funds through FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P., within CINTESIS, R&D Unit (reference UIDB/4255/2020).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



BSP, EH, JAF and JB participated in the study design. BSP, EH and AA participated in the data extraction. BSP, EH, AA, WC, AB, BG, GWC, JMA, JAF and JB participated in the data analysis, manuscript writing and critical review of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernardo Sousa-Pinto.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Queries used to retrieve, for each country, Google Trends on searches involving both chronic diseases and Covid-19-related search terms. Table S2. Percentages of Google Trends on non-respiratory chronic diseases (diabetes, hypertension, and Crohn’s disease) corresponding to (i) expected baseline searches, (ii) excess searches beyond those including Covid-19-related terms, and (iii) searches with Covid-19-related terms. Unless otherwise indicated, search peaks were observed in March. Table S3. Pearson correlation coefficients between Google Trends (GT) and Google News items on asthma for the periods of January–May 2020 and January–March 2020. Figure S1. 2020 Google Trends for “acute pneumonia” (as a disease), “asthma” (as a disease), “chronic obstructive pulmonary disease” (COPD) (as a disease), “diabetes” (as a disorder), “hypertension” (as a medical condition). Figure S2. Monthly average Google Trends for “diabetes” (as a disorder) between January and May of 2020. Figure S3. Monthly average Google Trends for “hypertension” (as a medical condition) between January and May of 2020. Figure S4. Monthly average Google Trends for “Crohn’s disease” (as a disease) between January and May of 2020. Figure S5. Weekly Google Trends and Google News data on “asthma” in 19 countries.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sousa-Pinto, B., Heffler, E., Antó, A. et al. Anomalous asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Google Trends patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic. Clin Transl Allergy 10, 47 (2020).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: