- Position article and guidelines
- Open Access
EAACI: A European Declaration on Immunotherapy. Designing the future of allergen specific immunotherapy
- Moises A Calderon1Email author,
- Pascal Demoly2,
- Roy Gerth van Wijk3,
- Jean Bousquet4,
- Aziz Sheikh5,
- Anthony Frew6,
- Glenis Scadding7,
- Claus Bachert8,
- Hans J Malling9,
- Rudolph Valenta10,
- Beatrice Bilo11,
- Antonio Nieto12,
- Cezmi Akdis13,
- Jocelyne Just14,
- Carmen Vidal15,
- Eva M Varga16,
- Emilio Alvarez-Cuesta17,
- Barbara Bohle18,
- Albrecht Bufe19,
- Walter G Canonica20,
- Victoria Cardona21,
- Ronald Dahl22,
- Alain Didier23,
- Stephen R Durham24,
- Peter Eng25,
- Montserrat Fernandez-Rivas26,
- Lars Jacobsen27,
- Marek Jutel28,
- Jörg Kleine-Tebbe29,
- Ludger Klimek30,
- Jan Lötvall31,
- Carmen Moreno32,
- Ralph Mosges33,
- Antonella Muraro34,
- Bodo Niggemann35,
- Giovanni Pajno36,
- Giovanni Passalacqua37,
- Oliver Pfaar38,
- Sabina Rak39,
- Gianenrico Senna40,
- Gabriela Senti41,
- Erkka Valovirta42,
- Marianne van Hage43,
- Johannes C Virchow44,
- Ulrich Wahn45 and
- Nikolaos Papadopoulos46
© Calderon et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
- Received: 24 September 2012
- Accepted: 9 October 2012
- Published: 30 October 2012
Allergy today is a public health concern of pandemic proportions, affecting more than 150 million people in Europe alone. In view of epidemiological trends, the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) predicts that within the next few decades, more than half of the European population may at some point in their lives experience some type of allergy.
Not only do allergic patients suffer from a debilitating disease, with the potential for major impact on their quality of life, career progression, personal development and lifestyle choices, but they also constitute a significant burden on health economics and macroeconomics due to the days of lost productivity and underperformance. Given that allergy triggers, including urbanization, industrialization, pollution and climate change, are not expected to change in the foreseeable future, it is imperative that steps are taken to develop, strengthen and optimize preventive and treatment strategies.
Allergen specific immunotherapy is the only currently available medical intervention that has the potential to affect the natural course of the disease. Years of basic science research, clinical trials, and systematic reviews and meta-analyses have convincingly shown that allergen specific immunotherapy can achieve substantial results for patients, improving the allergic individuals’ quality of life, reducing the long-term costs and burden of allergies, and changing the course of the disease. Allergen specific immunotherapy not only effectively alleviates allergy symptoms, but it has a long-term effect after conclusion of the treatment and can prevent the progression of allergic diseases.
Unfortunately, allergen specific immunotherapy has not yet received adequate attention from European institutions, including research funding bodies, even though this could be a most rewarding field in terms of return on investments, translational value and European integration and, a field in which Europe is recognized as a worldwide leader. Evaluation and surveillance of the full cost of allergic diseases is still lacking and further progress is being stifled by the variety of health systems across Europe. This means that the general population remains unaware of the potential use of allergen specific immunotherapy and its potential benefits.
Promoting awareness of the effectiveness of allergen specific immunotherapy
Updating national healthcare policies to support allergen specific immunotherapy
Prioritising funding for allergen specific immunotherapy research
Monitoring the macroeconomic and health economic parameters of allergy
Reinforcing allergy teaching in medical disciplines and specialties
The effective implementation of the above policies has the potential for a major positive impact on European health and well-being in the next decade.
- Health economics
- Quality of life
At the beginning of the 20th century, allergy was viewed as a rare disease. Since then, several incompletely understood factors have triggered a dramatic increase more evident over the last four decades. Initially, the highest prevalence was in Westernized societies: and current estimates suggest that up to 30% of Europeans could suffer from allergic rhinitis or conjunctivitis, up to 20% of children from asthma, 15% from allergic skin conditions and 8% from food allergy. In other regions of the world, the prevalence, which was previously low, is now increasing[1–3]. The burden peaks in the 20–40 year old age group with clinical symptoms of rhinitis reaching 45%. The worldwide numbers are equally worrying. Almost half a billion people suffer from rhinitis[4, 5] and approximately 300 million from asthma. Since many patients do not report their symptoms or are not properly diagnosed, the actual size of the problem could be even larger. Taking into account the upward trends shown by epidemiological studies, EAACI predicts that within the next few decades more than half of the European population will suffer from some type of allergy[7, 8].
The problem does not lie simply with respiratory allergies. Food allergies are also becoming more frequent and severe. Occupational allergies, drug allergies and allergic reactions to the venom of stinging insects (which can be potentially fatal) add further complexity and concerns. Finally, new types of allergic diseases and allergies against previously non-allergenic substances are being increasingly reported.
The impact of allergic disease is detrimental both for individual sufferers, their carers and for society as a whole. Patients face impairment in their quality of life, their sleep and mood, their competence at work or school and their overall personal development. Society now confronts increasing associated costs on a scale that will soon become unaffordable. With a current estimate of more than 150 million patients and a prediction of more than 300 million in Europe in the next decade, allergies constitute a public health concern of pandemic proportions requiring immediate action[8–12].
The impact of allergy on the quality of life of Europeans
At a public health level allergic diseases have a detrimental impact on personal development, career progression and lifestyle choices for patients and their families. People with allergic conditions are at a disadvantage, which affects their school performance, work performance and social life.
Children with allergy demonstrate difficulty in coping at school and develop associated learning difficulties and sleeping problems. As a result, it has been observed that sleepiness and mood swings frequently lead children to be isolated, perform less at school and even get bullied by their peers. Family life and personal relations are subsequently disturbed[15–17].
Adult and adolescent patients also face a significantly higher amount of problems in their workplace due to increased sick days and productivity reduction. Cognitive functions are impaired and can be especially detrimental for school, university or work performance[15, 16, 19]. Finally, several studies have shown that allergic individuals have a higher risk of developing depression as well as higher risk of depression in mothers with an asthmatic child.
The impact of allergies on the quality of life of sufferers can be as high, or higher, than diseases that are perceived as more ‘serious’ (i.e. diabetes). Lately, physicians and scientists have been utilizing a set of specific tools in order to evaluate the different domains of quality of life of allergic patients. The findings stemming from this make us realize the extent of the issues and underline the urgent need for solutions. By focusing on quality of life as a key impact of allergies and asthma, we will be able to give European patients renewed access to optimism. In addition, we should never forget that a small yet significant proportion of allergic reactions might result in death; people at risk need to be prioritized and protected.
The impact of allergy on health economics and macroeconomics
The associated reduction in productivity and the rising number of sick days taken by allergic patients represents one of the biggest negative impacts on national, business and health economies in Europe[22, 23].
Allergy health costs and their continuing escalation have an adverse effect on the European economy due to both direct costs (e.g. in the context of considering asthma alone, pharmaceutical costs stands at €3.6 billion per year and health care services at a further €4.3 billion per year) and, perhaps even greater, indirect costs. In total, 15% of the population is receiving long-term treatment in Europe for allergies and/or asthma, making it the most common reason for a long-term treatment in children and young people. Among the direct medical costs, the primary components are diagnostic tests, consultations and medication, while an additional major cost item is hospitalization, usually associated with severe exacerbations of asthma or severe anaphylactic reactions[25, 26].
Moreover, performance deficits, loss of productivity and absenteeism are closely linked to allergy suffering and have a major effect on macroeconomics. Asthma and rhinitis are estimated to result in more than 100 million lost workdays and missed school days each year in Europe (not only children absent from school on any given day, but also parents' productivity or absence from work)[27–29].
Recently, it became apparent that in addition to absenteeism, hundreds of millions of Euros are also lost by “presenteeism”, a condition in which people go to work, but are unable to perform to their optimum capacity. The total cost of asthma alone is estimated at more than €25 billion annually. The cost of rhinitis is probably higher but, unfortunately, large scale socioeconomic studies in Europe are lacking. Unpublished investigations by the European allergy network GA2LEN calculate the current loss due to untreated allergic rhinitis-related presenteeism to be approximately a €100 billion annually to employers. This is based on employment figures from European statistics, but does not measure the loss to society due to presenteeism at schools or universities. Understanding and monitoring the costs of allergic diseases should be a priority and all health care systems should take into account the rapid increase in prevalence, increase in severity and cost of allergies as they may receive unsustainable demands from these conditions alone.
The unsustainability of allergy’s current symptomatic treatments
Currently, allergies are in most cases treated by short-term symptom relieving or long-term anti-inflammatory drugs[31–33]. The introduction of the latter, of which corticosteroids are the most prominent, has reduced some of the more serious outcomes of these diseases. However, important drawbacks in regard to pharmacotherapy have also become evident: firstly, the effectiveness of current medications in controlling allergy symptoms is suboptimal. Even under the well-controlled conditions of a clinical trial, and after optimizing treatment, a considerable proportion of patients, sometimes even higher than 50%, will continue to experience troublesome symptoms. Secondly, and most importantly, even after years of a continuous, effective treatment, symptoms relapse very shortly after ceasing daily use of medication. Finally, long-term use of drug treatment increases the possibility, but also the fear, of adverse effects[36, 37]. This is unacceptable for patients who respond with a characteristic lack of compliance to medical advice and frequently resort to non-proven – and often expensive – complementary and alternative ‘treatments’ with poor results and which even may, if anything, exacerbate the problem.
With the increasing costs of newer medications and increasing number of sufferers, this continuous dependence on drugs is unsustainable. Both patients and physicians call for more effective symptom control, but also for treatments with long-term effects: a cure of the disease is what should be the target for researchers and public health decision makers in the coming years.
The promise for a cure and the role of allergen specific immunotherapy
Aspects of modern-day European lifestyle, including dietary patterns, urban living, industrialization, exposure to cigarette smoke and other pollutants, and several other factors, are major triggers of symptoms in allergic patients and these are not expected to change on a significant scale within the next few years. It is therefore important to strengthen and optimize preventive and treatment strategies. This has been clearly stated in the EU Sustainable Development Strategy; all European citizens should have the means to improve their quality of life, and mental and physical health, and have access to the best preventive measures.
Allergen specific immunotherapy with preparations which have confirmed effectiveness and tolerability in adequate studies covering the specific claims made, is effective in alleviating allergy symptoms to a similar (or even larger) extent than pharmacological treatments for asthma, allergic rhinitis[41, 42] and allergic conjunctivitis. At present it is the only curative treatment for Hymenoptera (bee and wasp) venom allergy. Unlike symptomatic medications, the benefits of allergen specific immunotherapy continue several years after discontinuation of the treatment[44–46]. Moreover, specific products for allergen specific immunotherapy have shown to have disease-modifying capacities being able to prevent the progression of allergic diseases, as in the case of hay fever that may frequently lead to asthma[47–51] and to reduce the risk of new sensitizations. Recent studies have shown that allergen specific immunotherapy has a role in the treatment of food allergy in order to reduce the risk of fatal anaphylaxis. Therefore, allergen specific immunotherapy is currently the only medical intervention that could potentially reverse the increasing disease trends being seen in Europe and elsewhere.
Allergen specific immunotherapy has been used as a medical treatment for over a century, offered mostly to the more severe or difficult patients, in whom use of medications is unsatisfactory, either because of lack of efficacy or because of unacceptable untoward effects. Currently, it is used only as a second-line treatment. However, in recent international guidelines and academic position statements, it has been advocated for use in those with milder disease in order to prevent chronic irreversible structural changes in the airways. Allergen specific immunotherapy should thus be considered as a treatment strategy in those with early-onset and/or mild disease in order to maximise the potential for the all-important disease-modifying capacities[4, 53].
Major technological advances in the quality and formulation of extracts used, new and more patient-friendly delivery systems and a deeper understanding of the mechanisms of allergic diseases have all led to the expectation of a major breakthrough in allergy treatment, in which allergen specific immunotherapy should play a crucial role.
What allergen specific immunotherapy can achieve
Allergen specific immunotherapy holds considerable promise for patients and, by extension, for society as a whole. When used properly, following careful diagnosis, and with good quality, well-characterized and clinically documented extracts, it can transform the life of people living with allergic diseases.
Allergen specific immunotherapy has been found to be effective in reducing symptoms of allergic rhinitis and allergic asthma and improving the quality of life of allergy sufferers. It also results in reduced use of symptom relieving medications. Allergen specific immunotherapy has the potential for important longer-term benefits, even after cessation of the treatment. In patients with allergy to insect venom or food allergy, allergen specific immunotherapy is able to prevent life-threatening reactions. Different routes for allergen specific immunotherapy have been evaluated, such as the subcutaneous, sublingual, oral, nasal, bronchial, and intra-lymphatic, the first two of these routes being the most commonly used in clinical practice today. The most common allergens used in clinical practice are aero-allergens for seasonal and perennial allergy; more recently, latex and food allergens have been evaluated in clinical trial with promising results to be confirmed.
Both allergy specialists and general internists/family physicians benefit from a therapeutic intervention that not only reduces symptoms in their patients, but also gives strong hope that the underlying allergy will be cured and/or stopped in its progression. Especially in children in whom the prospect of one allergy following the other (the ‘allergic march’) is ever present, it also offers a way for putting a break on this process, by preventing the progression from, for example, allergic rhinitis to asthma.
For public health
Allergen specific immunotherapy is currently the only treatment that offers the possibility of reducing long-term allergic disease burden and thereby the considerable costs associated with treatment; this is achieved by beneficially altering the natural course of the disease. Several pharmaco-economic studies have shown important benefits even from early time points, with steady increase with time. It is conceivable that further research may lead to preventive vaccination for allergies, as is now well-established in relation to many infectious diseases.
Long-term effects of allergen specific immunotherapy
There is encouraging emerging evidence that children receiving allergen specific immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis develop considerably less asthma 10 years later, in comparison to children that do not (control), supporting the case for allergen specific immunotherapy in preventing progression of allergies to more severe forms. Given the considerable potential associated with this immune-modulatory treatment approach, this is an area in which there is a need for considerably more research.
Major milestones for allergen specific immunotherapy
It has taken considerable time to reach the current degree of effectiveness and safety of allergen specific immunotherapy. Several appropriately designed clinical trials have proven the effectiveness of allergen specific immunotherapy of specific products in allergic rhinitis, asthma and venom allergy. Such trials have not been easy to design and perform for many reasons: extracts, populations, dosing schedules, disease localization, and allergen exposure are among the factors that vary considerably and have to be taken into account[55–57]. Nevertheless, different independent systematic reviews and meta-analyses of blinded randomized controlled studies have consistently confirmed efficacy and effectiveness; with the recent large phase III trials, allergen specific immunotherapy has moved from experience and dogma to evidence based medicine and facts[58, 59]. Furthermore, long-term effects have been repeatedly shown, after treatment cessation. Based on these findings, national and international evidence-based guidelines have been developed in order to assist practising physicians in selecting the appropriate patients and preparations and in optimizing treatment.
To this end, the continuous improvement of technologies that lead to high quality extracts and formulations have had a major beneficial impact on both safety and efficacy of allergen specific immunotherapy. Moreover, the new delivery routes, such as sublingual allergen immunotherapy, have further added to the armamentarium of allergy specialists, offering more convenient solutions and high safety.
Molecular allergology is expected to take the field to the next step, as the components of treatment will be defined to precision in quality and quantity.
Major bottlenecks for further diffusion of allergen specific immunotherapy
Even small changes in dose schedules may affect results both in efficacy and safety. The potential schemes are numerous and should be examined comprehensively.
The design of the studies, their analysis and how to interpret their results should be refined bearing in mind that pharmacotherapy and immunotherapy of allergic diseases have commonalties and differences.
Although we are much closer than ever to understanding the basic mechanisms of allergen specific immunotherapy, there are still several open questions which, if answered, would enable us to manipulate immune responses that are already established.
New extract preparations and especially vaccines containing molecular components require validation. The complexity of possible component combinations requires novel bioinformatic approaches. Studies exploring cost-effectiveness of allergic rhinitis and asthma are still lacking and should be assessed in relation to the various health systems across Europe. The macro-economic impact of allergies and the long-term cost-effectiveness of allergen specific immunotherapy need further detailed evaluation and attention.
Although it represents one of the most rewarding fields in terms of return on investments, translational value and European integration, allergen specific immunotherapy has not received adequate attention from European research funding bodies. It is a field in which Europe is already recognized as a leader worldwide and it is important that we now capitalize on this leadership position.
Awareness of allergen specific immunotherapy and its treatment potential is inadequate in the general population. In some cases immunotherapeutic approaches are mistakenly considered to be ‘alternative’, non-proven treatments.
Call for action
Allergic diseases, including asthma, are amongst the top smoldering risks of global healthcare. The need to deploy effective treatment solutions such as allergen specific immunotherapy to stop and potentially reverse allergy’s impact on European health, well-being and macroeconomics is more urgent than ever before.
We call upon Europe’s policy makers to co-ordinate actions and improve individual and public health in allergy by:
Promoting allergen specific immunotherapy awareness
The pandemic dimensions of allergic diseases highlights the need for awareness at all levels. Millions of patients who see little or no improvement with symptomatic drug treatments, or wish to adopt a more curative approach to their illness can benefit from allergen specific immunotherapy and should therefore be aware of the availability and benefits of such treatment. Awareness campaigns, and patient educational programs at pan-European or national levels, should be promoted in order to maximize the effects of the treatment on Europe’s population.
Update national healthcare policies to support allergen specific immunotherapy
The huge socio-economic burden of allergic disease calls for setting priorities. By prioritizing allergen specific immunotherapy in health planning and by designing healthcare policies that support allergen specific immunotherapy treatments of allergy through national health insurance subsidization, long-term effects of allergic diseases at a national, social and individual level will be substantially reduced. The prevention of allergic diseases can result not only in significant cost reduction, but also in a major improvement of the quality of life of Europeans.
Prioritize funding for allergen specific immunotherapy research
There has in recent years been tremendous progress in effectively diagnosing and treating specific allergies. Treatment approaches can and should be optimized. Innovative approaches are underway. Recent advances in molecular technology are destined to revolutionize immunotherapy treatments. Allergen specific immunotherapy research needs to be catalyzed by European research funding schemes, as the majority of current funding derives from the industry, thus focusing only on part of the treatment’s full capacity.
Monitoring the macroeconomic and health economic parameters of allergy
There is a need for cost-benefit, cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses as allergic diseases are increasingly affecting large numbers of people with substantial cost implications. This is an important part of the need to monitor allergies in general, taking into account the rapid changes in prevalence and their widespread implications. Treatments like allergen specific immunotherapy that can combat both the symptoms and the long-term consequences can be more cost effective than routine health care by breaking the vicious circle of living with allergies and coping with prolonged periods of suffering and medical treatment.
Streamline medical disciplines and specialties
Health systems around Europe differ widely in regard to the provided services and range of health care professionals who address allergies. This results in insufficient and unequal access to allergy services. Allergen specific immunotherapy is a highly specialized value-added treatment that can only be delivered by allergy specialists. However, the enormous number of allergic patients requires a wide range of health care professionals to be constantly trained and informed of new evidence as well as being equipped with appropriate tools to adequately respond to the expanding allergy incidents and patients’ needs.
The effective implementation of the above policies would have a major positive impact in European health and well-being in the years to come.
- Asher MI, Montefort S, Björkstén B, Lai CK, Strachan DP, Weiland SK, Williams H: Worldwide time trends in the prevalence of symptoms of asthma, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, and eczema in childhood: ISAAC Phases One and Three repeat multicountry cross-sectional surveys.; ISAAC Phase Three Study Group. Lancet. 2006, 368 (9537): 733-743. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69283-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pearce N, Ait-Khaled N, Beasley R, Mallol J, Keil U, Mitchell E: Worldwide trends in the prevalence of asthma symptoms: phase III of the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC). Thorax. 2007, 62: 758-766. 10.1136/thx.2006.070169.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jarvis D, Newson R, Lotvall J, Hastan D, Tomassen P, Keil T, Gjomarkaj M, Forsberg B, Gunnbjornsdottir M, Minov J, Brozek G, Dahlen SE, Toskala E, Kowalski ML, Olze H, Howarth P, Krämer U, Baelum J, Loureiro C, Kasper L, Bousquet PJ, Bousquet J, Bachert C, Fokkens W, Burney P: Asthma in adults and its association with chronic rhinosinusitis: The GA2LEN survey in Europe. Allergy. 2012, 67: 91-98. 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2011.02709.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bousquet J, Khaltaev N, Cruz AA, Denburg J, Fokkens WJ, Togias A: Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) 2008 update (in collaboration with the World Health Organization, GA(2)LEN and AllerGen).; World Health Organization; GA(2)LEN; AllerGen. Allergy. 2008, 63 (Suppl 86): 8-160.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wallace DV, Dykewicz MS, Bernstein DI, Blessing-Moore J, Cox L, Khan DA: The diagnosis and management of rhinitis: an updated practice parameter. Joint Task Force on Practice; American Academy of Allergy; Asthma & Immunology; American College of Allergy; Asthma and Immunology; Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008, 122 (2 Suppl): S1-S84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- World Health Organization (WHO): Fact sheet No. 307 on Asthma. 2011Google Scholar
- Punekar YS, Sheikh A: Establishing the incidence and prevalence of clinician-diagnosed allergic conditions in children and adolescents using routinely collected data from general practices. Clin Exp Allergy. 2009, 39 (8): 1209-1216. 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2009.03248.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Isolauri E, Huurre A, Salminem S, Impivaara O: The allergy epidemic extends beyond the past two decades. Clin Exp Allergy. 2004, 34: 1007-1010. 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2004.01999.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gupta R, Sheikh A, Strachan DP, Anderson HR: Time trends in allergic disorders in the UK. Thorax. 2007, 62 (1): 91-96. 10.1136/thx.2004.038844.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grize L, Gassner M, Wüthrich B, Bringolf-Isler B, Takken-Sahli K, Sennhauser FH: Trends in prevalence of asthma, allergic rhinitis and atopic dermatitis in 5–7-year old Swiss children from 1992 to 2001. Allergy. 2006, 61 (5): 556-562. 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2006.01030.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smith JA, Drake R, Simpson A, Woodcock A, Pickles A, Custovic A: Dimensions of respiratory symptoms in preschool children: population-based birth cohort study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008, 177 (12): 1358-1363. 10.1164/rccm.200709-1419OC.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Anandan C, Nurmatov U, van Schayck OC, Sheikh A: Is the prevalence of asthma declining? Systematic review of epidemiological studies. Allergy. 2010, 65 (2): 152-167. 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.02244.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Siroux V, Boudier A, Anto JM, Cazzoletti L, Accordini S, Alonso J: Quality-of-life and asthma-severity in general population asthmatics: results of the ECRHS II study. Allergy. 2008, 63 (5): 547-554. 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2008.01638.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Walker S, Khan-Wasti S, Fletcher M, Cullinan P, Harris J, Sheikh A: Seasonal allergic rhinitis is associated with a detrimental effect on examination performance in United Kingdom teenagers: case–control study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007, 120: 381-387. 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.03.034.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bousquet J, Neukirch F, Bousquet PJ, Gehano P, Klossek JM, Le Gal M: Severity and impairment of allergic rhinitis in patients consulting in primary care. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006, 117: 158-162. 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.09.047.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stuck BA, Czaijkowski J, Hagner AE, Klimek L, Verse T, Hörmann K: Changes in daytime sleepiness, quality of life, and objective sleep patterns in seasonal allergic rhinitis: a controlled clinical trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004, 113: 663-668. 10.1016/j.jaci.2003.12.589.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baiardini I, Braido F, Tarantini F, Porcu A, Bonini S, Bousquet PJ: ARIA-suggested drugs for allergic rhinitis: what impact on quality of life? A GA2LEN review. Allergy. 2008, 63 (6): 660-669. 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2008.01649.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bachert C, Bousquet J, Canonica GW, Durham SR: The XPERTTM study group. XPERTTM Levocetirizine improves quality of life and reduces costs in long-term management of persistent allergic rhinitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004, 114: 838-844. 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.05.070.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Virchow JC, Kay S, Demoly P, Mullol J, Canonica W, Higgins V: Impact of ocular symptoms on quality of life (QoL), work productivity and resource utilisation in allergic rhinitis patients – an observational, cross sectional study in four countries in Europe. J Med Econ. 2011, 14 (3): 305-314. 10.3111/13696998.2011.576039.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wertz DA, Pollack M, Rodgers K, Bohn RL, Sacco P, Sullivan SD: Impact of asthma control on sleep, attendance at work, normal activities, and disease burden. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2010, 105 (2): 118-123. 10.1016/j.anai.2010.05.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lefevre F, Moreau D, Sémon E, Kalaboka S, Annesi-Maesano I, Just J: Maternal depression related to infant's wheezing. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2011, 22 (6): 608-613. 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2011.01155.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gupta R, Sheikh A, Strachan DP, Anderson HR: Burden of allergic disease in the UK: secondary analyses of national databases. Clin Exp Allergy. 2004, 34 (4): 520-526. 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2004.1935.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Anandan C, Gupta R, Simpson CR, Fischbacher C, Sheikh A: Epidemiology and disease burden from allergic disease in Scotland: analyses of national databases. J R Soc Med. 2009, 102 (10): 431-442. 10.1258/jrsm.2009.090027.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- European Respiratory Society (ERS): European Lung White Book. The First Comprehensive Survey on Respiratory Health in Europe. 2003Google Scholar
- Accordini S, Corsico A, Cerveri I, Gislason D, Gulsvik A, Janson C: The socio-economic burden of asthma is substantial in Europe. Allergy. 2008, 63 (1): 116-124.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sullivan SD, Turk F: An evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of omalizumab for the treatment of severe allergic asthma. Allergy. 2008, 63: 670-684. 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2008.01723.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bousquet J, Demarteau N, Mullol J, van den Akker-van Marle ME, Van Ganse E, Bachert C: Costs associated with persistent allergic rhinitis are reduced by levocetirizine. Allergy. 2005, 60: 788-794. 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2005.00820.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zuberbier T, Lötvall J: Allergies have a socio-economic impact. European academy of allergology and clinical immunology, annual meeting 2008. Allergy. 2008, 63 (Suppl. 84): 280-Google Scholar
- Reed SD, Lee TA, McCrory DC: The economic burden of allergic rhinitis: a critical evaluation of the literature. PharmacoEconomics. 2004, 22 (6): 345-361. 10.2165/00019053-200422060-00002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nasser S, Vestenbaek U, Beriot-Mathiot A, Poulsen PB: Cost-effectiveness of specific immunotherapy with Grazax in allergic rhinitis co-existing with asthma. Allergy. 2008, 63: 1624-1629. 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2008.01743.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guilbert TW, Morgan WJ, Zeiger RS, Mauger DT, Boehmer SJ, Szefler SJ: Long-term inhaled corticosteroids in preschool children at high risk for asthma. N Engl J Med. 2006, 354 (19): 1985-1997. 10.1056/NEJMoa051378.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marinho S, Simpson A, Custovic A: Allergen avoidance in the secondary and tertiary prevention of allergic diseases: does it work?. Prim Care Respir J. 2006, 15 (3): 152-158. 10.1016/j.pcrj.2006.02.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Phan H, Moeller ML, Nahata MC: Treatment of allergic rhinitis in infants and children: efficacy and safety of second-generation antihistamines and the leukotriene receptor antagonist montelukast. Drugs. 2009, 69 (18): 2541-2576. 10.2165/9884960-000000000-00000.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Murray CS, Woodcock A, Langley SJ, Morris J, Custovic A: IFWIN study team. Secondary prevention of asthma by the use of Inhaled Fluticasone propionate in Wheezy INfants (IFWIN): double-blind, randomised, controlled study. Lancet. 2006, 368 (9537): 754-762. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69285-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- White P, Smith H, Baker N, Davis W, Frew A: Symptom control in patients with hay fever in UK general practice: how well are we doing and is there a need for allergen immunotherapy?. Clin Exp Allergy. 1998, 28 (3): 266-270. 10.1046/j.1365-2222.1998.00237.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Allen DB: Effects of inhaled steroids on growth, bone metabolism, and adrenal function. Adv Pediatr. 2006, 53: 101-110. 10.1016/j.yapd.2006.04.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Layton D, Wilton L, Boshier A, Cornelius V, Harris S, Shakir SA: Comparison of the risk of drowsiness and sedation between levocetirizine and desloratadine: a prescription-event monitoring study in England. Drug Saf. 2006, 29 (10): 897-909. 10.2165/00002018-200629100-00007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Passalacqua G, Bousquet PJ, Carlsen KH, Kemp J, Lockey RF, Niggemann B, Pawankar R, Price D, Bousquet J: ARIA update: I–Systematic review of complementary and alternative medicine for rhinitis and asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006, 117 (5): 1054-1062. 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.12.1308.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Council of the European Union: Review of the EU Sustainable Developmental Strategy (EU SDS): Renewed Strategy. 2006, 10917/06Google Scholar
- Abramson MJ, Puy RM, Weiner JM: Injection allergen immunotherapy for asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010, 4 (8): CD001186-Google Scholar
- Calderon MA, Alves B, Jacobson M, Hurwitz B, Sheikh A, Durham S: Allergen injection immunotherapy for seasonal allergic rhinitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007, 24 (1): CD001936-Google Scholar
- Radulovic S, Calderon MA, Wilson D, Durham S: Sublingual immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010, 8 (12): CD002893-Google Scholar
- Calderon MA, Penagos M, Sheikh A, Canonica GW, Durham SR: Sublingual immunotherapy for allergic conjunctivitis: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Exp Allergy. 2011, 41 (9): 1263-1272. 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2011.03835.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Durham SR, Walker SM, Varga EM, Jacobson MR, O'Brien F, Noble W, Till SJ, Hamid QA, Nouri-Aria KT: Long-term clinical efficacy of grass-pollen immunotherapy. N Engl J Med. 1999, 341 (7): 468-475. 10.1056/NEJM199908123410702.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Durham SR, Emminger W, Kapp A, Colombo G, de Monchy JG, Rak S, Scadding GK, Andersen JS, Riis B, Dahl R: Long-term clinical efficacy in grass pollen-induced rhinoconjunctivitis after treatment with SQ-standardized grass allergy immunotherapy tablet. J. Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010, 125 (1): 131-138. 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.10.035.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Durham SR, Emminger W, Kapp A, de Monchy JG, Rak S, Scadding GK, Wurtzen PA, Andersen JS, Tholstrup B, Riis B, Dahl R: SQ-standardized sublingual grass immunotherapy: Confirmation of disease modification 2 years after 3 years of treatment in a randomized trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012, 129 (3): 717-725. 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.12.973.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jacobsen L, Niggemann B, Dreborg S, Ferdousi HA, Halken S, Høst A, Koivikko A, Norberg LA, Valovirta E, Wahn U, Möller C, The PAT investigator group: Specific immunotherapy has long-term preventive effect of seasonal and perennial asthma: 10-year follow-up on the PAT study. Allergy. 2007, 62 (8): 943-948. 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01451.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eng PA, Borer-Reinhold M, Heijnen IA, Gnehm HP: Twelve-year follow-up after discontinuation of preseasonal grass pollen immunotherapy in childhood. Allergy. 2006, 61 (2): 198-201. 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2006.01011.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Novembre E, Galli E, Landi F, Caffarelli C, Pifferi M, De Marco E, Burastero SE, Calori G, Benetti L, Bonazza P, Puccinelli P, Parmiani S, Bernardini R, Vierucci A: Coseasonal sublingual immunotherapy reduces the development of asthma in children with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004, 114 (4): 851-857. 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.07.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marogna M, Spadolini I, Massolo A, Canonica GW, Passalacqua G: Long-lasting effects of sublingual immunotherapy according to its duration: a 15-year prospective study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010, 126 (5): 969-975. 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.08.030.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Canonica GW, Bousquet J, Casale T: Sub-lingual immunotherapy: World Allergy Organization Position Paper 2009. Allergy. 2009, 64 (Suppl 91): 1-59.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Noon L, Cantab BC: Prophylactic inoculation against hay fever. Lancet. 1911, 177 (4580): 1572-1573. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)78276-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bousquet J, Lockey R, Malling HJ: Allergen immunotherapy: therapeutic vaccines for allergic diseases. A WHO position paper. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1998, 102 (4 Pt 1): 558-562.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Passalacqua G, Compalati E, Canonica GW: Advances in allergen-specific immunotherapy. Curr Drug Targets. 2009, 10 (12): 1255-1262. 10.2174/138945009789753237.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bousquet PJ, Calderón MA, Demoly P, Larenas D, Passalacqua G, Bachert C, Brozek J, Canonica GW, Casale T, Fonseca J, Dahl R, Durham SR, Merk H, Worm M, Wahn U, Zuberbier T, Schünemann HJ, Bousquet J: The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Statement applied to allergen-specific immunotherapy with inhalant allergens: a Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GA(2)LEN) article. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011, 127 (1): 49-56. 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.09.017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bousquet J, Schünemann HJ, Bousquet PJ, Bachert C, Canonica GW, Casale TB, Demoly P, Durham S, Carlsen KH, Malling HJ, Passalacqua G, Simons FE, Anto J, Baena-Cagnani CE, Bergmann KC, Bieber T, Briggs AH, Brozek J, Calderon MA, Dahl R, Devillier P, Gerth van Wijk R, Howarth P, Larenas D, Papadopoulos NG, Schmid-Grendelmeier P, Zuberbier T: How to design and evaluate randomized controlled trials in immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis: an ARIA-GA(2) LEN statement. Allergy. 2011, 66 (6): 765-774. 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2011.02590.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Calderón M, Cardona V, Demoly P: EAACI 100 Years of Immunotherapy Experts Panel. One hundred years of allergen immunotherapy European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology celebration: review of unanswered questions. Allergy. 2012, 67 (4): 462-476. 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2012.02785.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Calderón MA, Casale TB, Togias A, Bousquet J, Durham SR, Demoly P: Allergen-specific immunotherapy for respiratory allergies: from meta-analysis to registration and beyond. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011, 127 (1): 30-38. 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.08.024.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jacobsen L, Wahn U, Bilo MB: Allergen-specific immunotherapy provides immediate, long-term and preventive clinical effects in children and adults: the effects of immunotherapy can be categorised by level of benefit -the centenary of allergen specific subcutaneous immunotherapy. Clin Transl Allergy. 2012, 2: 8-10.1186/2045-7022-2-8.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.