Volume 1 Supplement 1

Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Meeting 2011

Open Access

The clinical role of positive latex IgE in patients with food/pollen adverse reactions

  • Arianna Aruanno1,
  • Eleonora Nucera1,
  • Alessandro Buonomo1,
  • Tiziana De Pasquale1,
  • Valentina Pecora1,
  • Sonia Musumeci1,
  • Amira Colagiovanni1,
  • Vito Sabato1,
  • Lucilla Pascolini1,
  • Anna Giula Ricci1,
  • Angela Rizzi1 and
  • Domenico Schiavino1
Clinical and Translational Allergy20111(Suppl 1):P82

https://doi.org/10.1186/2045-7022-1-S1-P82

Published: 12 August 2011

Natural rubber latex allergy (NRL-A) is an international problem of public health. About 50-60% of NRL-A patients may present adverse reactions after ingestion cross-reacting vegetable foods. This condition is called "Latex-fruit Syndrome" and is matter of research. The aim of our study is distinguishing between clinical/subclinical latex-fruit syndrome and cross-sensitization to latex and food/pollens allergens on the basis of latex recombinant allergens. We studied 19 patients with food hypersensitivity and serological evidences of NRL sensitization. They underwent an accurate allergological evaluation (skin prick test with latex, food and pollen extracts, specific IgE to latex and recombinant allergens, challenge provocation tests). The patients were divided in two groups: group 1) 9 patients allergic to fruits/vegetables and/or pollens, with serological, but not clinical NRL-A; group 2) 10 patients with clinical and serological latex and fruits/vegetables allergy. The same number of patients was positive to pollens in each group. All group 1 patients presented negative provocation challenges and a monosensitization to Hev b8 (and other recombinant profilins), probably linked to a cross-sensitization to pollens and foods. These data suggest that profilin sensitization determines false positivity from NRL-A diagnostic test. Consequently the observed in vitro reactivity to NRL is not clinically relevant in patients with adverse food reactions and it does not determine always a latex-fruit syndrome. Instead, in group 2 we observed positive NRL provocation challenges and sensitization to rHev b 8 , but also to other recombinant latex allergens (rHev b 5, rHev b 6.01, rHev b 6.02). These patients probably presented a latex-fruit syndrome.

We supposed that the available panel of recombinant latex allergens could be effective to demonstrate a significant difference between latex-fruit syndrome and cross-sensitization to latex and food/pollens allergens. So further investigations are needed with a larger group of patients.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Allergy Department, Policlinico A Gemelli

Copyright

© Aruanno et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement