Study | Year | LOE (1a to 5) | Study design | Study groups | Clinical end-point efficacy | Conclusion |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Woodworth et al. | 2004 | 3b | Prospective case control study | Adults with CRSwNP from which 8 AFRS en 6 eosinophilic mucin rhinosinusitis were treated with oral prednisone (60Â mg for 3Â days, 40Â mg for 3Â days, 30Â mg for 3Â days, 20Â mg for 12Â days) | 1. SNOT-20 2. Nasal endoscopy score 3. Mucosal IL-5, IL-13, eotaxin, MCP-4 | Significant reduction in nasal endoscopy scores and inflammatory markers, non-significant reduction in SNOT-20 scores |
Landsberg et al. | 2007 | 3b | Prospective case control study | Adult AFRS and CRSwNP patients received 1Â mg/kg prednisone for 10Â days | 1. CT Lund Mackay scores 2. Nasal endoscopy score, but no scoring system used | CT score changes were significantly greater in AFRS patients compared to CRSwNP |
Kupferberg et al. | 1997 | 4 | Retrospective case control study | Adult and adolescent AFRS patients (13–69 years) that underwent surgery and receiving: (1) no treatment; (2) oral steroids (4 days 40 mg, then 4 days 30 mg, then 20 mg/day until 1 month postop); (3) oral steroids and oral antifungals; (4) oral antifungals | 1. Nasal endoscopy score 2. Symptom scoring | Postoperative treatment with oral steroids alone improved 90% of the patients, however, disease recurrence was seen after cessation of steroids |
Kuhn and Javer | 2000 | 4 | Case series | Postoperative steroids in adult AFRS patients (0.4Â mg/kg/day for 4Â days, then 0.3Â mg/kg/day for 4Â days, then 0.2Â mg/kg/day maintenance dose) | Nasal endoscopy score | Endoscopic stage 0 maintained if oral steroid was maintained for an average of 4.5Â months |