Volume 4 Supplement 1

3rd Pediatric Allergy and Asthma Meeting (PAAM)

Open Access

PD39 - Application of population pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation in the design of the optimal dose regime of rupatadine in children 2-5 year old children

  • Marta Valle1,
  • Javier Estevez1,
  • Lisa Charlotte Martial1,
  • Eva Santamaria2 and
  • Iñaki Izquierdo2
Clinical and Translational Allergy20144(Suppl 1):P39

https://doi.org/10.1186/2045-7022-4-S1-P39

Published: 28 February 2014

Background

Rupatadine is a second generation antihistamine H1 and antagonist of PAF for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and urticaria for which a new pediatric oral solution is now available for children between 6-11 y/o.

Objectives

1) To optimize the dose regime in children between 2 to 5 y/o old to reach similar plasma concentrations to children of 6-11 y/o with allergic rhinitis.

2) To build a new population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model in children including all ages (2-11 y/o) to evaluate if the proposed regimen, as a function of weight, is adequate to reach rupatadine exposure similar to adults and ≥ 12 y/o.

Methods

A popPK model was developed, using data from 6-11 y/o study (STD I) including 11 patients with full PK profile in allergic rhinitis. A second study (STD2) including 2-5 y/o was optimal designed based on the parameters estimated from STD I, assuming: inclusion of < 40 children, < 5 samples per child in the shortest time window. A final popPK model was built for children 2-11 years. Influence of different covariates on model parameters was also evaluated. PopPK modeling and simulation was performed in NONMEM and optimal design in WINPOP software.

Results

The dose administered in STD II was 2.5 mg/kg (weight 10-25 kg) or 5 mg/kg (weight > 25 kg) and 3 samples per child were needed in a 2h time window. A two-compartmental model with first-order absorption and elimination where clearance depends on weight fitted the data for 2-11 y/o children. Mean (SD) estimates of parameters obtained by noncompartmental analysis of the steady-state simulated plasma concentrations for both subsets of children were similar: Cmax, 2.54(1.26) vs 1.96(0.52) ng/mL; AUC, 10.74(3.09) vs 10.38(4.31) ng/mL/h; t1/2, 12.28(3.09) vs 15.94(4.09), for children 6-11 y/o and children 2-5 y/o, respectively.

Conclusion

A popPK model for rupatadine was used in the design of a new clinical study. Rupatadine clearance in children 2-11 years increases with age. The used range of doses in children provides similar exposure to rupatadine to that associated with efficacy and safety in adults and adolescents ≥ 12 y/o.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Sant Pau
(2)
Uriach

Copyright

© Valle et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement