Skip to main content

Table 1 Items included in the questionnaire about “General approach to polysensitized subjects” (1A) and results (1B)

From: Diagnosis and allergen immunotherapy treatment of polysensitised patients with respiratory allergy in Spain: an Allergists’ Consensus

1A)

1B)

    

Items

Mean

Median

% Panellists against

IQ

Result

Diagnostic approach to a patient with suspected respiratory allergy

1- Skin-tests are sufficient for the correct aetiologic diagnosis of patients with respiratory allergy

3.08

3

32.26

2

D

2- The size of the wheal is useful in the clinically relevant allergen identification

3.75

3

35

2.5

NC

3- A positive skin-test indicates the clinical relevance of the allergenic source

2.11

2

9.68

1.5

D

4- The specific IgE determination and quantification help us to establish the clinical relevance of an allergenic source

6.22

7

28.33

1

A

5- Molecular diagnosis serves to differentiate primary sensitisation from cross-reactivity

7.84

8

6.45

1

A

6- In molecular diagnostic tests, a cut-off that allows us to differentiate relevant allergens does not exist

6.97

7

27.42

2

A

7- The patient diagnostic approach must be similar, independent of whether respiratory symptoms are persistent or intermittent

6.92

8

25.81

3

A

8- The directed medical history and symptoms-exposure schedule allows us to identify the responsible allergenic source of the patient’s clinic in some cases

7

7

11.67

0

A

9- Organ-specific provocation tests are not useful in daily clinical practice due to their difficult interpretation and because they are time consuming

7.1

8

16.67

1

A

10a- The polysensitised patient is one who presents sensitisation to various allergenic sources

7.47

8

11.67

2

A

10b- The polyallergic patient is one who presents sensitisation with demonstrated clinical relevance

7.90

8

8.33

1

A

11- The aerobiological information should include the allergenic load in the environment

7.42

8

14.52

1

A

Determinant criteria in immunotherapy prescription

12- Before immunotherapy prescription to a polysensitised patient, an organ-specific provocation with all suspected relevant allergens must be conducted

2.4

2

17.74

2

D

13- Assessment of the intensity of symptoms and medication consumption in relation to allergenic exposure should be habitual practice in immunotherapy prescription

8.23

8

1.61

1

A

14- Immunotherapy should only be used based on clinical studies that follow current guidelines

6.92

7.5

29.03

2.5

A

15-Immunotherapy prescription is advised only if relevant allergen sources are identified

7.22

7

6.67

1

A

Immunotherapy composition

16- Enzymatic activity (proteolysis) over others should not be used

7.6

8

14.52

2

A

17- It is acceptable to include up to two or three allergens in one vaccine if their relevance is identified

6.28

7

28.33

2

A

18- Immunotherapy should include all relevant allergenic sources

3.63

3

25

1

D

19- Safety studies of a given extract are applicable to all extracts from identical allergenic sources

2.31

2

14.52

2

D

20- Efficacy studies of a given extract are assimilable to all extracts from identical allergenic sources

2.55

2

17.74

2

D

21- The extract mixture has a nonspecific positive therapeutic effect despite dosage reduction of included allergens

4.27

5

46.67

2

NC

22- If mixtures of several allergenic sources are used in immunotherapy, it is necessary to ensure the effective concentration of each one in the final composition

7.89

8

6.45

2

A

24- The dose–response studies are conducted with vaccines from one allergenic source so the results cannot be extrapolated to those of mixtures

7.16

8

22.58

1.5

A

  1. A = Agreement; D = Disagreement; NC = No Consensus; IQ = Interquartile range.
  2. % panellists = percentage of panellists out of the median region.