From: Basophil activation test: food challenge in a test tube or specialist research tool?
Study population | Prevalence of the food allergy in the population |
Origin of the study population (e.g. recruited from a specialized Allergy clinic or from the general population) | |
Geographical location | |
Associated respiratory and food allergies | |
Study design | Inclusion criteria (e.g. whether sensitized as well as non-sensitized patients were included in the study) |
Gold-standard used as a comparator to determine the diagnostic cut-offs | |
Criteria for performing OFC (e.g. whether patients with a history of anaphylaxis or other risk factors for a severe reaction or with high levels of IgE or large wheals on skin prick test were included) | |
OFC protocol (e.g. criteria for stopping the OFC, criteria for a positive OFC, intervals between doses and duration of OFC) | |
Laboratory procedure | Interval between blood collection and the performance of BAT |
Allergen extracts or purified/recombinant allergens used | |
Concentration of the allergens | |
Pre-incubation with IL-3 | |
Markers and antibodies (e.g. clones, fluorochromes) used to identify the basophils and to detect basophil activation | |
Flow cytometry data analyses | Adopted gating strategy |
Parameters used as the outcomes of the test [e.g. CD63 or CD203c, % or SI, CD-sens, area under the dose–response curve] | |
Definition of negative gate | |
Whether results were corrected for the background | |
Cytometer used and application settings |