Skip to main content

Table 3 Items included in the questionnaire about “Olive and grass pollen allergy” (3A) and results (3B)

From: Diagnosis and allergen immunotherapy treatment of polysensitised patients with respiratory allergy in Spain: an Allergists’ Consensus

3A)

3B)

Items

Mean

Median

% Panellists

IQ

Result

Epidemiology

51- All olive-grass cosensitised patients are equal if they are from the same geographic area

2.15

2

9.68

2

D

52- All olive-grass cosensitised patients are equal if they have the same size wheals

1.84

1

4.84

1.5

D

53- The genuine sensitisation components (Phl p 1–5 and Ole e 1) are suitable for identifying phenotypes

7.1

7

11.29

1

A

Clinical relevance

54- Geographic and aerobiological data are very important in identifying the clinical relevance of olive and grass cosensitised patients

7.29

7

11.29

1

A

55- In olive-grass cosensitised patients, skin-tests have major limitations in confirming the clinical relevance

7.18

7.5

16.13

1

A

56- A higher level of olive IgE than grass (or vice versa) is useful to highlight the clinical relevance in cosensitised patients

4.08

3

45

2

NC

57- Confirmation of true sensitisation to olive or grass requires an IgE against genuine components

7.56

8

8.06

1

A

58- The clinical relevance in olive-grass cosensitised patients can only be defined by organ-specific provocation tests

3.19

3

25.81

2

D

Therapeutic strategy (Immunotherapy indication)

59- The identification of the relevant allergenic source in patients cosensitised to grass and olive is essential before prescribing immunotherapy

7.98

8

4.84

1

A

60- The demonstrated efficacy in grass immunotherapy is the same as 50% mixture with olive

2.92

3

20

1

D

61- In the case of olive-grass cosensitised patients, it is preferable to formulate personalised mixes (variable percentages of the two extracts)

4.52

5

71.67

4

NC

62- As grass and olive are complex extracts, the dosage of individual allergens in immunotherapy would be appropriate

7.05

7

10

1

A

63- The olive-grass cosensitised patient should not receive immunotherapy until more efficacy data is obtained

2.55

2

14.52

2

D

Therapeutic strategy (Immunotherapy formulation)

64- The lack of knowledge of therapeutic doses makes the formulation of mixtures difficult

6.82

7

27.42

2

A

65- It is correct to formulate olive-grass personalised mixes depending on the size of the wheal

2.53

2

22.58

2

D

66- It is preferable to formulate olive-grass personalised mixes (varying percentages of the two extracts) in proportion to the IgE amount corresponding to the two extracts

3.72

3

46.67

3.5

NC

67- If the manufacturer guarantees the individual doses of allergens, mixtures of different Poaceae and olive varieties are irrelevant

6.95

7

23.33

1

A

68- Grass and olive personalised mixtures (varying percentages of the two extracts) should never be used

3.92

3

30

2

D

  1. A = Agreement; D = Disagreement; NC = No Consensus; IQ = Interquartile range.
  2. % panellists = percentage of panellists out of the median region.